Trump: American Troops ‘Terminated’ al-Baghdadi’s ‘Number One Replacement’
Trump did not name the terrorist.
President Donald Trump tweeted that American troops have taken out dead ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s “number one replacement.”
Trump did not name the person.
Just confirmed that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s number one replacement has been terminated by American troops. Most likely would have taken the top spot – Now he is also Dead!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 29, 2019
Officials and others have wondered who would take al-Baghdadi’s place at the top of ISIS. A raid over the weekend killed the leader, who led the terrorist group for years.
Reports indicated “The Destroyer” Abdullah Qardash may have taken the place of al-Baghdadi.
Qardash ran “day-to-day operations” of ISIS. He supposedly “took over” after troops killed al-Baghdadi.
The State Department on Monday confirmed ISIS spokesman Abu Hassan al-Muhajir died “in Syria during an operation by U.S. forces in which the Syrian Democratic Forces also played a large role.”
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Terminated? Now the Democrat’s will accuse Trump of murder.
And with extreme prejudice.
We can only hope the hero war dog on the mission took the time to crap in ISIS headquarters.
“Terminate” is what you do to end a pregnancy right? So he obviously didn’t commit murder, it was just an abortion, which is an activity specifically protected under the US Constitution right?
I think they had a conversation with the mother while the replacement was kept sedated.
It was a late term abortion so right up the Democrats alley.
I certainly hope that he forgot to tell Nancy, again
All Obama got was Osama and an action figure. Trump gets a twofer and he gets is the left going apologetic.
More Trumpian mind-games. This move might be calculated to get the various lieutenants in the ISIS world to start infighting among themselves, and to make themselves more visible in the process.
Aren’t there some rather firm regulations about members of the armed services conducting political business while on duty.
If this isn’t 100% political, then pul-eeze tell me what is.
Defeating terrorists falls under national security…try again.
Carl von Clausewitz: War is the continuation of Diplomacy by other means.
Trump is NOT a “member of the armed services” – he is the Commander in Chief, but our constitution specifies that the Commander in Chief is a Civilian Official, and does not hold a Military Rank.
Seriously?
Hard of thinking are you?
I’m sorry, I don’t understand what you wrote. I don’t see anything in the story about any member of the armed services doing anything political. Could you please explain? I have a feeling there’s some sort of bizarre theory at work here, but I’m not sure what.
Let me explain it for you. tiger is a synonym for pussy.
pussy66 is a commie. Commies always lie and make up stories. Like here. Commies are really stupid except for the murdering scum at the top, so pussy66 thinks he/she/it is real cute. Reality – dumber than a damn brick.
I don’t think they have a deep bench. Let’s hope 3rd string has a really rough time and forfeits.
Trump is wearing his George S. Patton war face.
“Patton frequently kept his face in a scowl he referred to as his “war face.”
Let’s hope this is the beginning of a string of deaths.
Were ObNa and Pelosi notified?
Yep. It was in the newspaper. Informed.
Was it a WAPO “reporter”? Asking for a friend…