David Gregory of Meet the Press sat down Sunday morning with House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Ambassador Thomas Pickering, who has led the state department’s review of Benghazi, to discuss the investigation into the aftermath of the September 11th, 2012 attack on the US consulate. An interesting turn of events occurred when Gregory revisited White House press secretary Jay Carney’s previous narrative regarding changes in the Benghazi talking points.
David Gregory:
“The press secretary to the president, Jay Carney, said back in November, he talked about how changes were made, who made changes to these talking points prepared for Congress and for Ambassador Rice. This is what he said back on November 28th.”
“We know that’s not accurate. We know that in fact the State Department, Victoria Nuland, was involved in removing from the talking points previous warnings about security and references to a terrorist group, an extremist group, being involved in the attack, based on what was being reported on the ground and by intelligence. Is the administration guilty of playing politics with terrorism?”
Even David Gregory recognizes that Carney’s explanation on the Benghazi talking points revisions didn’t add up, and is asking that all important question: Is the administration guilty of playing politics with terrorism?
![](https://c1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/subscribe-ad.jpg)
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Shouldn’t that man be in jail for illegally brandishing an AR-15 Magazine in Washington D.C?
Until any justice is done, to either quash the unconstitutional law, or to enforce it equally amongst all citizens, I have very little respect for anything that man says.
Who’s got the Etch A Sketch now?
A liberal who works for a liberal media company asking another liberal about their investigation of liberal malfeasance… who replies: not my charter to delve into liberal talking points editing.
What else could Gregory say – that Carney’s a bald-faced liar? Well, yes, he could’ve said that
Frank: Yep, it’s what I ‘understate’ as VTC. See below.
“…not accurate.” Jeeeeeeepers, Davey, what a Vast Testicular Concavity you exhibit, Network Dude!!
Like the pot calling the kettle ‘black.’
[…] stood all these last eight months. And now the MSM appear pathetic and frustrated as they discover, question, catch-up, and painfully opine, yet, set their attention now on saving Hillary Clinton's bacon for […]
[…] In*sur*rec*tion: NBC’s David Gregory Calls Carney’s Explanation on Revised Benghazi Talking Points “Not Accurat…. Is “not accurate” a euphemism for “He was lying through his scummy […]
[…] NBC’s David Gregory Calls Carney’s Explanation on Revised Benghazi Talking Points “… […]