Now they want judicial restraint?

From The NY Times Editors on why the Supreme Court should leave the Obamacare mandate alone:

All of these issues are best resolved in the political system, not the courts. The Supreme Court ought to show judicial restraint, adhere to precedent and uphold the constitutionality of health care reform.

What a strange, convenient notion of judicial restraint.  Should that restraint also apply when the next Congress passes the guns and tobacco mandate?

Tags: NY Times

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY