Image 01 Image 03

Search

Disney challenged legislation taking over Reedy Creek District, claiming retaliation for Disney exercising First Amendment rights. Judge quoting binding precedent: “when a statute is facially constitutional, a plaintiff cannot bring a free-speech challenge by claiming that the lawmakers who passed it acted with a constitutionally impermissible purpose.”

"These regulations hold public institutions accountable for protecting the First Amendment rights of students and student organizations, and they require private colleges and universities that promise their students and faculty free expression, free inquiry, and diversity of thought to live up to those ideals.”