Report: Male Athletes Have Taken More Than 2,293 Gold Medals From Women
Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee: “How many more women and girls will be subjected to an uneven playing field?”
The Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee (CWALAC) released a report showing that male athletes have stolen 2,293 gold medals from females.
CWALAC’s research discovered the following:
- Trans-identifying males have stolen over 2,293 gold medals from women and girls in the United States, pushing each rightful champion down to second place.
- Trans-identifying male athletes have stolen over $501,498 in prize money from women in professional sports.
- In California alone, over 611 women and girls have taken silver below a male allowed to compete in the women’s category.
- Trans-identifying males have competed in more than 14,301 female sport events, amateur and professional.
“It is shockingly unfair for biological women to have to compete against trans-identifying men,” said Penny Nance, CEO and President of CWALAC. “Our research finding that trans-identifying males have stolen over 2,293 gold medals from women in the United States is an outrage. Biological men have distinct advantages over biological women. This reality not only puts women in harm’s way, but it eliminates opportunities for biological women to earn a living and win competitions. Congress must act to protect biological women.”
CWALAC found increases in all of those categories since its July 2025 report.
“How many more women and girls will be subjected to an uneven playing field?” demanded Nance. “It’s time to put an end to this inherent unfairness and protect women’s sports.”
CWALAC also used data compiled from HeCheated, a program that tracks everything male athletes have stolen from female athletes.
Out of 1,165 male athletes:
- 6,847 1st place finishes
- 1,349+ stolen awards
- 695+ broken records
“Congress should pass the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025 (H.R.28/S.9) to prohibit federally funded school athletic programs from allowing males to compete in women’s and girls’ sports; the Protection of Women in Olympic and Amateur Sports Act (H.R.1028/S. 405) to clarify that sports National Governing Bodies must designate women’s sports for women only under their Congressional authorization; and The Title IX Clarification Act (H.R. 8781/S.5179) to clarify that, for purposes of Title IX’s prohibition on discrimination in federally funded education programs and activities, the term ‘sex’ refers solely to an individual’s biological status as male or female,” added Nance.
The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on Wednesday called “Standing Up for Women in Sports: Ensuring Opportunity, Fairness and Safety for Female Athletes.”
During the hearing, Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) blasted Democrats because none of them showed up.
WOW! Senator Katie Britt just UNLEASHED on Democrats after not a single one showed up for today's hearing on Safety in Women's Sports:
"It can't go unspoken that not one member on the other side of the aisle has had the respect for women to come in here and ask questions, to… pic.twitter.com/8Fa6TfCdiB
— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) September 23, 2026
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) showed up for a bit, but I guess he only did that because he’s the ranking member.
He said NCAA president Charlie Baker, the former liberal GOP governor of Massachusetts, told Durbin there were fewer than 10 known transgender athletes among half a million college athletes.
“This vendetta against a small number of people in the trans community affects everyone” because even “cisgender girls,” an invented pathological term for girls without gender dysphoria, will endure “inappropriate gender verification checks” to keep male athletes out of their sports, Durbin claimed.
The real threats to female athletes are unequal pay and resources, rampant sexual abuse and other Title IX violations, Durbin said. He said he won’t ask questions at the hearing because it’s not a “responsible” use of the committee’s time, and got up to leave as Grassley swore in the witnesses.
Hey, Dick. ONE male athlete in female sports is too many. Absolutely NO male should be in a female sport.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
This obliterates the delusion that letting men cosplay as women does no damage to women. You are a misogynist if you demand males invade and conquer the spaces of females.
And consider how many simply said “forget it” when faced with male competition. I bet the loss number swells.
It is amazing how firmly the Communist Dems will grab onto mental illness and perversion as a ballot lifeline, tossing women and children to the side.
Feminist groups will be of no use since all they care about is (1) taxpayer-funded abortions up to the 666th trimester, and (2) maintaining the fiction of “fighting for women’s rights” to keep the donor cash flowing.
It’s like expecting the NAACP to defend and promote POCs, but it turns out to be more political than anything else. See: last VA governor’s race.
Charlie Baker – riiiiiiiight. Like voting fraud and human trafficking, Baker knows that is easy to not find something if you never look for it in the first place.
As Howie Carr says, he gave it a “good leaving alone.”
The tranny ideological nonsense is harming people. Foremost it harms the minor children getting butchered or injected with chemicals to create irreversible alterations to their growth, development and reproductive future. It hurts the female athletes who get robbed of victories, medals, records and scholarship opportunities. It hurts our society as public onlookers either dig in and fight, surrender, join the tranny mob or choose.to walk away/withdraw from society in disgust.
The Islamo-Marxist-Tranny Dhimmi-crat Party is pure, unabashed, unadulterated evil.
Women are voting for the party doing it.
If only men voted, the Democrat party would functionally cease to exist.
And this result is simply leftist women’s wokeness getting savagely arbitraged by reality. The same thing that befalls a wokeness.
Nothing to see here, folks.
…befalls ANY wokeness…
No, it’s not a pathological term, and it’s not really “invented”. In standard English the prefix “cis-” is the opposite of the prefix “trans-“. The moment you have “trans-anything”, you must of necessity also have “cis-that-thing”. “Trans-” means “on the other side”, and “cis-” means “on this side”. That is all. Transjordan and Cisjordan. Transatlantic and cisatlantic;, transpacific and cispacific. Transalpine and cisalpine. Translunar and cislunar. Trans-fatty acid and cis-fatty acid. Trans isomer and cis isomer. Transylvania and… apparently the term “Cisylvania” was never used to mean “the land on this side of the forest”, but it could easily have been.
And that leads me exactly to the next point I want to make. The reason there’s a Transylvania but no Cisylvania is probably because the people in Hungary who invented the name “Transylvania” for the land on the other side of the forest didn’t need a name for the land on this side of the same forest; they called it “here”. LIkewise, in most contexts we have no need for a name for cissexual people, because that is the norm and thus the default assumption. In most contexts a cissexual person is just a person; there’s no need to specify that their gender identity and biological sex match, any more than it’s necessary to specify that they have five fingers on each hand.
But when the topic is transsexuals then we need a term for normal people to contrast with it, and that term is “cissexual”. Or “cisgender”, if you insist on using “transgender”.
Consider the terms “neurodivergent” and “neurotypical”. “Neurodivergent” means “neurologically abnormal”; “neurotypical” means “neurologically normal”. In most contexts you don’t have to specify that someone is neurotypical; but when the topic is neurodivergency then you need a term for someone who isn’t divergent.
I want some of whatever it is you’re on, Milhouse.
I think what Milhouse is on is called “autism.”
No you don’t
Lots of words to say “absurd”. In a loquatious mood, Milhouse?
.
We already had perfectly good words for this concept.
Straight was one. Normal was another.
Liberals purposely invented a new word to make it sound clinical and pathological.
Like Dihydrogen Monoxide.
The cis and trans terms have been seized by the Left as they do with other words….creating neologisms. We don’t use cjs like we do trans….cisportation? Cis and trans are common chemistry terms….. Embrace there use in gender at your own risk.
Milhouse shows his true nutology
Sorry, but the whole “cis” and “trans” thing was made up out of whole cloth to try to legitimize their perversions. And to be sure, it is definitely a perversion when it involves harm to underage children.
Bastardizing the language is an old Communist trick. To wit (from our AI friends partly):
“Communists and associated leftist movements are frequently described by critics as strategically redefining key terms like inclusion, democracy, and citizenship to subvert societal structures and advance political agendas. According to analyses from sources like New Discourses, this involves reframing words through the lens of “Critical Marxism” or “Woke Marxism,” where concepts are interpreted as tools of oppressive power dynamics rather than neutral ideals. For instance, democracy is often redefined from “rule by the people” to “inclusive democracy” or “equity,” emphasizing structural disenfranchisement over individual rights.
Historical and linguistic analyses further illustrate this practice. The Dictionary of Communist Totalitarianism and reports on Soviet-era propaganda highlight how regimes like the USSR repurposed words such as “socialism” and “fascism” to align with party doctrine, effectively creating a distinct “Communist-speak” that obscured reality. Critics argue that this semantic manipulation allows authoritarian or revolutionary movements to claim the moral high ground of traditional liberal values while promoting fundamentally different, often collectivist, outcomes. This approach is seen as a method to neutralize opposition by making dissent appear as an attack on redefined virtues like justice or education.”
Lets keep it simple and call them deviants b/c they deviate from the norm while we call normal folks …normal. In fact lets go further and refuse any additional labels on ‘regular’ behavior at all especially those terms beloved of the woke/leftist mob intended to mainstream their ideological preferences by shifting the linguists.
Much simpler all around. All the made up labels of woke lefty weirdos get subsumed under deviant. If more specific language is needed to differentiate what type of deviant we use the terms preferred by the majority aka normies. So unhoused = homeless vagrant, trans whatever= tranny, minor attracted person = paedophile. Simple. No concessions to the woke mob.
You may not know this if you are not an athlete, but adult competitions often have a small cash purse for the winners. Every time a cross dressing man won a women’s cycling competition, road race, triathlon, weight lifting comp, they probably received some cash award. It is small but adds up.
Since this reports was released, they/them have been crying false all over the internet. They/them are being disingenuous (likely) or none them are athletes (also likely ) and have no way of knowing this.
Sadly, this will probably not end until enough women have had enough of cross dressing men, and I think we are a long way away from “enough.”
Is any end conceivable to the scourge of self-loathing women?
There could be, if they could manage to self loathe a little more….
“…fewer than 10 known transgender athletes among half a million college athletes.”
This is not an excuse to allow these men to compete against women, it’s a condemnation of those who are afflicting the many for the comfort of a few.
The male HS athletes aren’t just stealing trophies, they use their success at beating up women to get scholarships to colleges/universities.
College scholarships that are reserved for female athletes have regularly been award to these male “trans” people instead. They get a free ride to a four year degree. And for each one that does, a female athlete does NOT get a scholarship.
Of course, then they’re trapped – they have to continue the ridiculous farce of going around in womanface through their next four years, and have to actually “compete” on women’s teams in college or else they lose their scholarship.
Zero sympathy for them, but the result is they then steal yet more trophies from female athletes at every event for the next four years.
“Trans” man = pretend man.
“Trans” woman = pretend woman.
There, that makes it easier.
.
There, that makes it easier.
________________________
perhaps even simpler classifications:
men, women and the mentally retarded
I put the parentheses around “man” and “woman.” The trans just indicates how the farce is being perpetrated.
How many females took medals from males?
It’s an even playing field that they’re objecting to.
Until this craziness is quashed we need corporations and wealthy donors to start awarding prize money, scolarships, etc., to people of their own choice, namely the three highest placing biological females; with public recognition to match.