Image 01 Image 03

Writer Claims Jewish Studies Programs in American Higher Education Are a Waste

Writer Claims Jewish Studies Programs in American Higher Education Are a Waste

“At Ivy League colleges, 72.3 per cent of Jewish Studies faculty publicly denounced Israel.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV_j4Dh9koA

Generally speaking, anything with the word “studies” attached to it is suspect.

Dominic Green writes at the Jewish Chronicle:

The terrible waste that is Jewish Studies at American universities

In 1972, the United Negro College Fund asked the New York ad agency Young & Rubicam to help raise donations that could send young black students to college. The Mad Men’s pitch was “A mind is a terrible thing to waste, but a fine thing to invest in.”

The ghost of Young & Rubicam survives on the 28th floor of 3 World Trade Center after its agglomeration into VMLY&R. Give them three martinis and ask them for a campaign for funding Jewish Studies programmes in American universities, and they might come back with “Money is a terrible thing to waste, and Jewish Studies a terrible place to invest in.”

“Who Teaches Judaism in America?”, a survey commissioned by the Ronn Torossian Foundation, is the proof. Over the past 60 years, idealistic Jewish donors have poured millions of tax-deductibles into Jewish Studies. Not just to give their tradition the academic study it deserves, but also as a way of inculcating Jewish identity and strengthening American Jewish life.

The Torossian study shows that their money is wasted. These programmes are giving a kosher stamp to anti-Israel propaganda and delegitimisation. The study examines attitudes to Israel among the professors in 1,136 US colleges offering programmes in Jewish Studies and the spin-off fields of Israel Studies, Hebrew and Holocaust Studies between May 2021 and Spring 2026. Four in ten faculties have signed anti-Israel petitions. They include 14 endowed chair holders, the big beasts of the departmental jungle. At Ivy League colleges, 72.3 per cent of Jewish Studies faculty publicly denounced Israel. Columbia University topped the Ivies with 77 faculty boycotters, 27 events and statements for Faculty & Staff for Justice in Palestine (which was founded after the October 7 attacks), and five departments committed to boycotting their Israeli peers.

In the cheap seats, New York University came top, or bottom, in the nation with 148 faculty boycotters. Marion Kaplan, professor emerita of modern Jewish history, three-time winner of the National Jewish Book Award and Guggenheim Fellow, signed every major petition. Just over half (51.9 per cent) of all audited records documented “anti-Israel public signals”.

Statements that the survey does not consider anti-Israel: supporting a two-state solution, criticising the Israeli government, opposing settlement expansion and calling for accountability on civilian casualties.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Statements that the survey does not consider anti-Israel: supporting a two-state solution, criticising the Israeli government, opposing settlement expansion and calling for accountability on civilian casualties. Which means when you count the vast majority of such statements as anti-Israel, which they are, the numbers go even higher.

It is possible to be pro-Israel and for the fantasy of a “two-state solution”. It means you’re not very bright, but it’s a position many zionists have taken. But most of the time it’s an anti-Israel position.

Criticizing the Israeli government really depends what you’re criticizing it for. I criticize it all the time, for all sorts of things, and that’s definitely not being anti-Israel. But when you criticize it for daring to defend Israel’s existence and Israelis’ safety, when you criticize it for putting Israel’s vital interests ahead of those of Western bleeding-heart liberalism, when you criticize it for refusing to compromise on the Arab Nazis’ demand for dead Jews, that’s being anti-Israel.

Being against allowing Jews to live in Judaea is outright anti-semitism. Some people are against it temporarily or provisionally, claiming that while in principle it’s of course right, this is not the right time for it. That’s still antisemitic, just as opposing allowing black people to live where they’ll be vulnerable to white supremacists shooting at them would be regarded as racist. If black people want to live there, a non-racist supports that decision and devotes the resources to defend them there.

“Accountability on civilian casualties” basically means Israel, unlike any other nation, is not entitled to wage war to defend itself. That it’s not entitled to wage war the way we did against the Germans. And that’s antisemitic.

Damn. Why won’t LI’s admin just install one of the many tried-and-tested WP plugins that allow editing comments?