Trump Signs Executive Order Trimming Childhood Vaccine Schedule, Separate MMR Shots
This EO isn’t about pitting “pro-vaccine” against “anti-vaccine” camps. Rather it’s about giving Moms and Dads the actual data, not talking points, so they can make the call for their own children.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order urging greater flexibility in vaccine policy and expanded research, while advocating for a reduced childhood immunization schedule.
The order also calls for the combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine to be replaced with three separate shots administered during different medical appointments.
“You have the MMR, we want it in three separate vaccinations, given at separate times. Together there could be a possibility they’re quite lethal and separately, it looks like they are not at all lethal, but just very effective,” said Trump from the Oval Office as he signed the order.
The MMR vaccine is not lethal, and medical research shows no health benefit or reduced risk from splitting it. In contrast, separating the shots increases injection pain, leaves children unprotected longer, and lowers overall vaccination rates, according to experts.
Manufacturers also do not produce standalone measles, mumps or rubella vaccines for routine use in the United States.
Trump issued his order months after trying to slash the childhood vaccine schedule from 18 to 11. That move was blocked by a judge in March.
🚨 NOW: President Trump is in the Oval Office with RFK Jr. announcing an executive order giving FLEXIBILITY in the childhood vaccination schedule
Children should NOT have 72 jabs into their arms. Especially given we now know "scientists" like Fauci lie about them being "safe and… pic.twitter.com/uD8OM12PiD
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) August 10, 2026
Public health experts are criticizing this move.
Public health experts have raised concerns that spacing out shots, as Trump suggests, can lead to an increased risk that children become infected with a vaccine-preventable disease before returning for another visit.
Childhood vaccines — and how and when to give them in combination — go through rigorous studies, and safety tracking continues for years as the shots are used.
However, as noted in the fact sheet that is paired with this EO, the administration’s assessment found that our country recommends more childhood vaccines than any comparable country—more than double the number of doses recommended by some European countries. It also identified a set of consensus vaccines consistently recommended across all “peer” countries.
- In 1980, American children following the CDC immunization schedule received 23 vaccine doses in 7 shots against 7 different diseases. In 2024, the recommended number of routine vaccines had risen to at least 84 vaccine doses in at least 57 shots for 17 diseases, plus the RSV monoclonal antibody immunization for a total of 18 diseases. This is more than other developed nations.
- The scientific assessment recommends prioritizing 11 routine childhood vaccines, while preserving flexibility for parents and doctors to make individualized decisions for higher-risk children through shared clinical decision-making.
In his remarks, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. noted that robust research on vaccine effectiveness and safety would continue.
We have already launched unprecedented research effort examining vaccine safety and long-term health outcomes in American children. We are putting some of the largest health data sets in the country to work, including CDC’s vaccine safety data link, FDA’s best systems, and other major federal and private health data sources. We’re pursuing dozens of studies and analyses.
We are comparing health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. We’re examining aluminum adjuvants, the timing of the hepatitis B vaccine administered during pregnancy and administered during vaccines administered during pregnancy and outcomes ranging from allergies to autoimmune disease to autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. At NIH, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences are working with the National Toxicity Program on a comprehensive review of vaccine adjuvants, ingredients that are added to vaccines to amplify the body’s immune response. They will determine what the existing science establishes and where uncertainty remains and where we need additional research.
We’re bringing that same determination to autism. NIH has launched the Autism Data Science Initiative with 13 research awards, examining autism prevalence, causes, treatments, and services. Five of these will include vaccines among the potential factors that they examine…..
Next month, ARPA-H [Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health] is preparing a major new initiative focused on foundational causes and biology of autism and on better diagnostics, treatments, technologies, and tools for people with autism and their families. We will examine every biologically plausible hypothesis and leave no legitimate scientific question unexplored.
Mr. President, you have told us that you want answers. So do I.
If one were being logical and reasonable about this issue, this EO isn’t about pitting “pro-vaccine” against “anti-vaccine” camps; rather, it’s about giving Moms and Dads the actual data, not talking points, so they can make the call for their own children.
The legacy media and public health “experts” can huff and puff about “spacing out shots,” but they’ve spent decades dodging the uncomfortable fact that our schedule outpaces every peer nation’s, and parents deserve to know why.
RFK Jr. and the administration are promising real research instead of reflexive dismissal, and that alone is a refreshing change from the “just trust us” approach that’s fueled so much distrust in the first place(e.g., Fauci neglecting to mention the risks of the COVID vaccine during pregnancy).
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Good move. It’s true that there is safety data for each childhood vaccine. But there is no such data for grouped vaccines. It is not unreasonable to suspect that the immune response to many simultaneous vaccinations may produce an overwhelming immune response that has unintended consequences.
There is data from the CDC that shows that the combined MMR vaccine is correlated w/ increased rates of ASD in Black male children. This data is real and has been out there since the 1990’s. Now it’s only a correlation but it is concerning. In my opinion this data has been suppressed and this recommendation is longer overdue. Now other longitudinal studies did not find this correlation but I’d say alot of those researchers were highly motivated not to find the correlation, if you catch my drift. Also we know that undersirable findings rarely get published. I chose to the MMR in 3 seperate doses for my children, so in my state this has been a parent choice issue for a while. It doesn’t hold off the period of protection long as I just spaced it out over 6 weeks. People who say it’s going to cause “injection pain,” seemed to not be concerned about the idea of having to take repetitive “booster,” COVID shots. So I’m not sure why the panic about this? Let parents make informed decisions, is it really that complicated?
A number of us never got those massive injections.
I remember being in the room when the nurses entered ti give the shots – 2 days after being born. They turned therir back to their mother (and me). Why? No explanation, Mom had no idea what was happening. That was 19 years ago. Turns out, our granddaughter appears unaffected but others may well not have the same result.
“Trump issued his order months after trying to slash the childhood vaccine schedule from 18 to 11. That move was blocked by a judge in March.”
Why is the government even INVOLVED in this issue?
I don’t care what some judge thinks. He can kiss my shiny metal.
I have two objections to the updated schedule regarding those recommended for all children. The first is to the HPV vaccine and the second is to the Chicken Pox vaccine.