Image 01 Image 03

Pro-Trump Legal Group Launches Website Tracking the Hundreds of Lawsuits Blocking Trump’s Agenda

Pro-Trump Legal Group Launches Website Tracking the Hundreds of Lawsuits Blocking Trump’s Agenda

“The primary purpose [of the online database] is so that people can understand the enormous scope of judicial lawfare against the Trump administration.”

Like so many other things in recent history, Democrats will eventually regret using this tactic against the Trump administration.

The Washington Times reports:

Pro-Trump legal group launches website tracking 266 lawsuits blocking Trump’s agenda

A pro-Trump group launched an online website Tuesday detailing the more than 250 legal cases against President Trump’s agenda and tracking the crucial nationwide injunctions that were issued by lower court judges before the Supreme Court halted the practice last week.

In all, the Article III Foundation listed 266 lawsuits at JudicialSabotage.org. But there are plenty more of them against the administration, brought by individual plaintiffs such as illegal immigrants looking to stay in the country.

“The primary purpose [of the online database] is so that people can understand the enormous scope of judicial lawfare against the Trump administration. It is not just a few lawsuits. It is overwhelming all over the country,” said Will Chamberlain, senior counsel for the Article III Foundation. “What stuck out was the sheer number of injunctions that have been issued against the administration in such a short amount of time.”

About a third of the 266 lawsuits involve matters related to immigration policy. Other areas include transgender policies, spending and firing freezes, and efforts related to the budget-cutting Department of Government Efficiency.

On Friday, the Supreme Court delivered a 6-3 win for Mr. Trump’s administration, ruling that lower court judges issuing nationwide injunctions likely run afoul of the Judiciary Act of 1789.

The case involved a challenge to Mr. Trump’s move to end birthright citizenship, but the question that came to the court focused on the authority of district court judges to block nationwide policies after a district court judge issued a national halt to the birthright citizenship order.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 0 
 
 0
ztakddot | July 2, 2025 at 11:14 am

Unbelievable!!!


 
 0 
 
 0
George_Kaplan | July 3, 2025 at 12:39 am

Wasn’t there already a site like this? I seem to remember seeing something somewhere, though maybe the issue in question wasn’t listed, nor was the status?

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.