Supreme Court Pauses Order to Give Illegal Aliens Deportation Notice to Third-Party Countries
The order told Trump to give illegal aliens a 10 day notice.

The Supreme Court voted 6-3 to pause an order demanding President Donald Trump give illegal aliens a ten day deportation notice to third-party countries.
The order is stayed pending an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.
U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy issued a nationwide injunction stopping the Trump administration from deporting illegal aliens to countries they did not come from when the country refuses to take them back in.
The administration claimed it could deport the aliens to these third countries if the countries promise not to “persecute or torture” the people.
The majority did not explain their decision. The dissenting judges issued one of their long-winded opinions.

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Long winded by the 3 harpies. Can you image being one of their law clerks!
I would imagine their law clerks are all on board with the 3 tards.
I know you’re trying to be thorough, but I beg of you, save yourself the time and energy spent writing the dissenters in the article. We know. We always know.
Just coin an shorthand reference for them — such as The Furies, The Gorgons, or The Morrigan.
Morelocks.
Sometimes it’s so bad Kagan, an actual legal expert, can’t go along with the lefties. But when it can be recast as policy rather than legal, as here, “be careful in matters of life and death”, then she feels free to join the lefties.
Because judges are politicians too given the opportunity, they just have to dress up their arguments a particular way.
Well below the knee.
So, I am curious if I have this right.
The district court stay order is denied. the illegal gets deported ASAP, correct?
correct
Nope. Some other district judge will put a stop to it.
The Trump administration needs to add a new litmus test for all judicial nominees, i.e., ‘No Constitutional basis for the extension of any ruling’s effect beyond the borders of the jurisdiction of the issuing judge’ .
Congress is the proper body to do that and they should.
Send Justices Jackson and Sotomayor back to their countries of origin. Send Kagan to that country for which she feels the greater allegiance.
All three are 100% American. All three were born in the USA, to American parents.
To what country do you think Kagan feels allegiance? Venezuela?!
Lilliput
You consistently demonstrate a complete inability to detect or understand sarcasm or humor ( good or not … I’m not judging)…. Ever been tested for frontotemporal dementia (FTD)?
The wokiesta leftists hate this policy. Tough cookies. This policy takes direct aim at one common ploy seeking to avoid deportation from the USA. They figured out an overworked immigration system would in practice rubber stamp claims of ‘credible fear’ if spotted back to Nation of origin. This policy ends that bs. ‘So, if we send you back to Nation A you’d be targeted? No problem, your deportation flight is to Nation B, enjoy your trip,… who’s next?’
And a Lovely Parting Gift — of 100 quatloos and a box of self-sealing stem bolts.
If a country refuses to take their own citizen back, can we refuse to accept that? As in, that country can post guards at every yard of beach and border or we drop their children off
Better yet block all travel from those Nations to the USA. Refuse entry to any Citizen of those Nations. Block all trade with the USA. Block access to US capital markets, banking services and financial services. End all forms of aid. Close the Embassy, downgrade to a Consulate.
Stick the illegal on a flight headed to the country of origin on an airline that is the country’s flag carrier.
We can, but it is definitely ill-advised. We would be, in effect, violating that nation’s laws by illegally circumventing their border controls. And while I can understand the urge to go “these countries don’t respect our borders because X million of their citizens are here illegally!”, if we’re going to get those countries to cooperate with our borders, we really should respect theirs. Plus, they have a pretty strong case that the illegal alien came to our country via their own power & free will, while we would be using government resources to violate the laws of another country.
either we continue to live under UN laws or we maga
Can a legal eagle here explain/ comment on, the district judge Murphy stating it does not matter what Supreme Court ruled his order is still valid and must be followed?!? Can the Trump administration just ignore?
Oh oh. Somebody missed his No Kings picnic.
Different tracks. First is Federal.District CT (Judge Murphy) on the criminal charges ruled the ‘Maryland Man’ not to be a flight/security risk, granted and ordered release pending trial. Second is the Immigration system who, Judge Murphy conceded, my lawfully arrest and detain.
The SCOTUS ruling doesn’t say the Feds can simply throw folks onto a aircraft. The subject of the deportation to a 3rd Nation gets an opportunity to object. I suspect the Feds will attempt to streamline the process by requiring a list of unacceptable 3rd Nations with proof at immigration CT from the subject Alien and if not sufficient will order deportation.
He is correct. The Supreme Court stayed one order he made. That order is stayed, and the administration can ignore it. That doesn’t have any effect on any other order he’s made. It’s not as if the Supreme Court said all orders by this judge are automatically stayed and you can ignore him completely. All he said is that there is another order in place, which the administration didn’t appeal, so it was not stayed and he will enforce it. If the administration ignores that order it will be in contempt.
Holy Crap! Judge sidesteps SCOTUS. (cites dissent)
https://x.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1937306646654402632
There’s nothing remarkable about it. He correctly cited the dissent that points out an indisputable fact, that the May 21 order was not appealed and remains in effect.