Mahmoud Khalil Immediately Resumes Protesting Israel After Release by Judge
“accompanied now by private security”

Remember when the left demanded he be released so he could be with his wife and baby? He doesn’t seem to care about them as much as protesting Israel.
BREAKING: Mahmoud Khalil is protesting right outside the gates of Columbia University — and standing with him is none other than Manolo De Los Santos of The People's Forum. pic.twitter.com/jDioEYjK16
— Stu (@thestustustudio) June 22, 2025
Two days after a judge ordered that migrant Mahmoud Khalil be released, he is already back on the streets in NYC, accompanied now by private security. Khalil was a main organizer for the violent pro-Palestine occupations and disruptions at Columbia. pic.twitter.com/PGPyVCcq73
— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) June 23, 2025
ALERT: Just DAYS after a federal judge orders the release of Mahmoud Khalil he throws an anti-Israel rally at Columbia.
Khalil is NOT a legal citizen yet a federal judge has granted him the position to continue spewing anti-American rhetoric. pic.twitter.com/W8pVxjuDoX
— Rep. Wesley Hunt Press Office (@RepWPH) June 23, 2025

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Follow the money. Who is paying for the private security and living expenses?
Donors. It’s no secret that he has many sympathizers. So what? That’s not a crime. There’s no reason to suppose an illegal source.
Just deport him. At this point the judge can pound sand.
It be a real pity if he was run over while blocking traffic. Accidentally of course.
If he’s blocking traffic. If I were advising him I’d tell him to be extra careful not to break any laws, not even jaywalking, which in NYC is almost mandatory.
I don’t want supporters of rape and infanticide anywhere near my family. Get him far away from my country.
What you want is irrelevant.
Celebrity victim loser ; he was kidnapped and held hostage don’t you know ? Is like totally worse then what hamas does what happened to him, or so says AOC that Rhodes scholar.
What has citizenship got to do with it. So long as he is in the USA, regardless of the reason, he has the full protection of the first amendment, and thus the absolute right to spew whatever rhetoric he likes.
(Note: The freedom of speech is a universal and unalienable right, so he would have that even if he were in Lebanon. But if he were in Lebanon he would have no right to sue in a US court to enforce that right. Since he is in the USA he does have that right. And it is unconstitutional for the US government to take any action against him in retaliation for exercising that right. So long as protest is all he does; and he claims that’s all he’s ever done.)
To clarify: Freedom of speech is considered by US to be a universal and inalienable right. Other countries and cultures disagree.* He likely couldn’t even sue in a Lebanese court to enforce it – because they don’t recognize it.
(* You know, like the Progressive religion?)
Well, yes, of course by us. Who else even has that concept? But it is the basis of our entire national self-conception, and certainly it’s the basis of our law. We reject the idea that other countries are entitled to whatever laws they like. Laws that violate fundamental civil liberties are invalid no matter where they are, or what the local government has to say about it. That won’t stop them enforcing them.
“accompanied now by private security”
Why? To protect him against ICE? If so, he will discover that he has misread our Bill of Rights and the law.
My guess is that he is trying to get a confrontation so he can become a martyr (not a dead one, mind you – he’s not THAT committed to the cause).
Just keep arresting him for disturbing the peace and holding him 48 hours each time.
Only if he is disturbing the peace. That doesn’t just mean whatever a policeman wants it to mean. If it did it would be void for vagueness, like the vagrancy laws long ago.