Image 01 Image 03

Trump Touts ‘Great Progress Made’ in China Trade Talks, ‘Total Reset Negotiated’

Trump Touts ‘Great Progress Made’ in China Trade Talks, ‘Total Reset Negotiated’

What is the Democrats’ greatest fear? “That Trump’s policies will make America great again.”

In a Saturday evening Truth Social post, President Donald Trump announced that “great progress” had been made on day one of the U.S. trade talks with China. He further claimed that a “total reset” had been “negotiated.”

The U.S. trade team, led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, met with the Chinese delegation, led by Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, for 10 hours in Geneva, Switzerland, on Saturday. The goal was to break the communications freeze that began with Trump’s Liberation Day tariffs and has deepened as tensions escalated.

“A very good meeting today with China, in Switzerland,” Trump wrote. “Many things discussed, much agreed to. A total reset negotiated in a friendly, but constructive, manner. We want to see, for the good of both China and the U.S., an opening up of China to American business. GREAT PROGRESS MADE!!!”

The Associated Press noted that “no major breakthrough was announced” during the discussions. Citing an anonymous official, the AP reported that talks were set to continue on Sunday and that neither delegation spoke to the media following the initial round of negotiations.

According to the AP, a Saturday night editorial from China’s official Xinhua News Agency “said the talks had come about ‘at the request of the U.S. side’ — noting an earlier point of contention — and said China agreed to them ‘after taking full account of global expectations, national interests and appeals from U.S. businesses and consumers.'”

The Xinhua editorial said:

Whether the road ahead involves negotiation or confrontation, one thing is clear: China’s determination to safeguard its development interests is unshakable, and its stance on maintaining the global economic and trade order remains unwavering.

Talks should never be a pretext for continued coercion or extortion, and China will firmly reject any proposal that compromises core principles or undermines the broader cause of global equity.

Trump’s vague but optimistic portrayal of the talks offers little concrete insight into the meeting’s success or failure so far. Even his staunchest supporters, a group that includes me, acknowledge he is prone to exaggeration.

There is hope, however, that both countries will back down from the steep tariffs currently in place—145% on U.S. tariffs for Chinese imports and 125% on Chinese tariffs for U.S. imports.

In a Friday Truth Social post, Trump wrote, “80% Tariff seems right! Up to Scott.″

Realistically, an 80% tariff won’t help the situation all that much. As former Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross told Fox News host Larry Kudlow last month, once tariffs hit 50%, further increases have limited practical impact. At that point, Ross explained, leaders effectively signal that they no longer seek a trade relationship.

Ahead of the talks, Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Stimson Center, signaled low expectations for the Geneva meetings. She said, “The best scenario is for the two sides to agree to de-escalate on the… tariffs at the same time. It cannot just be words,” as per the AP.

This is essentially what Bessent told Fox News’ Laura Ingraham last week: “My sense is that this will be about de-escalation, not about the big trade deal. But we’ve got to de-escalate before we can move forward.”

The Left has disparaged Trump’s tariffs from the get-go, and the AP is no exception. The article says, “What seems clear is that Trump’s favorite economic weapon — import taxes, or tariffs — has not proved as mighty as he’d hoped.”

To bolster that assertion, the article quotes Jeff Moon, a trade official in the Obama administration who now runs the China Moon Strategies consultancy. He said, “For Trump, what’s happened here is that the rhetoric of his campaign has finally had to face economic reality. The idea that he was going to bring China to its knees in terms of tariffs was never going to work.”

It’s far too early to make statements like that, especially when numerous reports indicate that China is reeling from the economic strain of the tariffs.

The reality is that Democrats hope that Trump’s tariffs ruin the economy, a sentiment that editorial cartoonist Gary Varvel captured beautifully in a recent cartoon. A Democrat, lying on a psychiatrist’s couch, is asked, “What is your greatest fear?”

His reply? “That Trump’s policies will make America great again.”

Let’s give Trump, Bessent, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, all people who have built successful businesses in the real world and understand the economy far better than the Obama and Biden administrations’ stable of academics, a chance.

I, for one, would not bet against Trump.


Elizabeth writes commentary for Legal Insurrection and The Washington Examiner. She is an academy fellow at The Heritage Foundation. Please follow Elizabeth on LinkedIn or X.

 

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Qatar buying Trump now.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-will-accept-luxury-747-gift-royal-family-qatar-abc-says

What the hell? All he wants is luxury. I assumed the difficult Boeing retrofit was because of advanced communications or weaponry, something (presumably) Qatar cannot do better than Boeing. Now he’s going to use a plane that Qatar may have bugged or boobytrapped?

    The Gentle Grizzly in reply to artichoke. | May 11, 2025 at 2:21 pm

    Variation: I thought the presidential aircraft had to be sourced only from the manufacturer and is built under supervision.

    Qatar just bought 100 Boeing widebodies and had options on 100 more.

    Money talks.

    mailman in reply to artichoke. | May 11, 2025 at 2:40 pm

    Anyone with two or more functioning brain cells would have had their spidey senses tingling at the very first use of “people familiar with the story” 😂😂😂

    Come on man, switch the f88k on! 😂

      DudeAbides in reply to mailman. | May 11, 2025 at 3:45 pm

      Particularly since the WSJ already reported on this back on May 1st.

      https://www.wsj.com/business/airlines/air-force-one-trump-qatari-jet-l3harris-fc903838?st=G1CgNc

      Trump contracted this replacement back in his FIRST TERM, they were supposed to be ready this year, and now Boeing is saying they can’t deliver them until freaking 2035. TEN YEARS BEHIND SCHEDULE.

      Trump commissioned temporary replacements from L3Harris and they’re looking to rebuild a jet that happened to be used by the Qatari government in the past.

      Once again, leftists are trying to lie like its the 1990’s, that they have the slightest bit of credibility to report the truth, and that we can’t check their laughable lies.

        artichoke in reply to DudeAbides. | May 11, 2025 at 7:10 pm

        I am aware of Boeing’s delay as well as some of their many problems in recent years. But the news story said Qatar is supplying it. You say L3Harris is supplying it.

        That is quite different.

    mailman in reply to artichoke. | May 11, 2025 at 2:44 pm

    Oh but hang on…after a mere one second of searching the intrawebs it turns out that Boeing is a year behind schedule an BILLIONS of dollars over budget on the provisioning of a new AF1 replacement and that this aircraft in question was once used by the royal family and is being fitted out by military contractors 🤔🙄

    So essentially ABC lied and the smooth brains believed every word they said 😂😂

      steves59 in reply to mailman. | May 11, 2025 at 7:12 pm

      “So essentially ABC lied and the smooth brains believed every word they said 😂😂”

      Mailman, delivering the mail right here.

    Olinser in reply to artichoke. | May 11, 2025 at 3:37 pm

    Gosh, it’s almost like ABC and the media are just lying about it.

    WSJ reported on this weeks ago.

    Boeing was contracted to replace AF1, and is YEARS behind schedule with no actual firm delivery date from them. And oh by the way, they’re already billions over budget and want billions more.

    So Trump contracted L3Harris to make a temporary replacement, and they happen to be rebuilding a jet that Qatar once owned.

    Seriously, it’s actually comical that leftists think they can just blatantly lie like this and get away with it.

      The Gentle Grizzly in reply to Olinser. | May 11, 2025 at 8:03 pm

      Ahhhhh! Bu, they CAN get away with it, because with half of the American people primed to hold ill will against Trump, and most of them willing to take the mainstream media at face value the end effect is… well. they DO get away with it.

China doesn’t care about its citizens. It doesn’t care about unrest. It will gladly kill a few million dissenters if it needs to. Like it or not this gives it a leg up on trade negotiations vs the US and its over reliance on quarterly results. It also doesn’t help that democrats and corporate republicans want nothing to change and are likely bought and paid for either directly or indirectly by chinese interests.

Lenin wrote, “When it comes time to hang the capitalists, they will vie with each other for the rope contract.”

This is so true and what we are witness today in real time in so many ways,

The old globalist framework of the USA alone having an open consumer market and capital markets while it’s exports faced tariffs, import quota restrictions or outright bans and simultaneously the USA was expected to act as the defender of this system militarily while other Nations were free riding directing post Cold War defense spending to greater domestic economic subsidies to disadvantage US workers and companies is ….pretty well gonna go away. Especially should Vance carry the baton in ’28.

The economic focus for the coming decades will be on reshore/friend shore our supply chains, rewarding Nations who act cooperatively and compete within a fair trade system. The daily/weekly machinations of the stock market are less important in this future than the number number of industrial and manufacturing jobs and the labor force participation rate. The era of finance, entertainment and tech sectors being the primary focus of public economic policy are giving way to a wider focus on the total economy but especially for the broad middle-class the 70% in the center. Adjust and plan accordingly or don’t and be caught flat footed.

JackinSilverSpring | May 11, 2025 at 1:10 pm

I don’t know why the Trump Administration is so eager to arrive at a trade agreement with China. The CCP has used China’s cheap labor not for purposes of comparative advantage in trade or for the purposes of the economic benefits from trade, but rather as a targeted weapon to destroy the US’s manufacturing base. China should be the last country that the Trump Administration should be negotiating a trade deal.

USA

This is just negotiating through the media. Sort of like fighting a war using the media as well. I doubt much of anything has been agreed on or settled nor should it be. Miles to go.

China holds a truck load of our debt, which is scary to think about at first. We know this, they know this. But if they call it in and it’s worth little or nothing because they tanked our economy, what will they have? You can’t get blood from a turnip. It’s a dance that nobody wants to see stop on the wrong note.
.

    artichoke in reply to DSHornet. | May 11, 2025 at 7:00 pm

    China supposedly also has a lot of its own debt. So they have to keep selling things to make payments.

UnCivilServant | May 11, 2025 at 4:21 pm

Nothing I’m seeing looks like we’ve gotten anything out of the “deal”.

Decouple 100% from the CCP, they will not deal above board. Their track record speaks for itself.

Jaundiced Observer | May 12, 2025 at 11:33 am

I wonder if a) Trump’s administration will even realize that China is violating any agreement that gets negotiated or b) will do anything more meaningful to address those violations than the Bush, Obama, Trump I or Biden administrations did.

I’m guessing that this ends with Trump’s declaring victory and nothing’s really changing.