NCAA Bans Males From Female Sports After Trump Executive Order
“To that end, President Trump’s order provides a clear, national standard.”
The NCAA will ban males from female sports to comply with President Donald Trump’s executive order.
“The new policy limits competition in women’s sports to student-athletes assigned female at birth only,” the NCAA wrote in a press release. “The policy permits student-athletes assigned male at birth to practice with women’s teams and receive benefits such as medical care while practicing.”
The NCAA has allowed males in female sports since 2010. I didn’t realize it’s been that long!
It only shot to headlines when a man going by “Lia” Thomas joined the female swim team at the University of Pennsylvania.
Thomas crushed record after record.
Riley Gaines became a prominent voice when she tied with Thomas for fifth place in the 200-yard NCAA freestyle championship.
Gaines claimed the NCAA gave Thomas the trophy as a photo op. The organization said she could take the sixth-place trophy and pose with it.
“The NCAA is an organization made up of 1,100 colleges and universities in all 50 states that collectively enroll more than 530,000 student-athletes,” stated NCAA President Charlie Baker. “We strongly believe that clear, consistent, and uniform eligibility standards would best serve today’s student-athletes instead of a patchwork of conflicting state laws and court decisions.”
The NCAA faced numerous lawsuits and heat from many females and red states.
In 2022, the NCAA adopted a policy that allowed individual sports to set eligibility.
That wasn’t enough, though. We demanded an end to males in female sports.
Thank goodness Trump made that happen.
“To that end, President Trump’s order provides a clear, national standard,” Baker added.
Yes, it does.
No males in female sports. No males in female spaces.
“The updated policy combined with these resources follows through on the NCAA’s constitutional commitment to deliver intercollegiate athletics competition and to protect, support and enhance the mental and physical health of student-athletes,” said Baker. “This national standard brings much needed clarity as we modernize college sports for today’s student-athletes.”
I would laugh at those two sentences from Baker if this weren’t a serious situation.
The NCAA never cared about female athletes’ safety and health. The organization cared more about a male’s feelings.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Imagine 10 years ago we would be celebrating this
We have become
So absurd
Now, we have to strike the records these men set in women’s sports. Until that is done as well, women will be forever competing with men.
Now, if only we could restore medals and scholarships to the women who deserved them.
The Feds should make it easier to hold those accountable to who decided this was a good idea.
1) What needs to be remembered is that the order signed by Trump can be reversed by the next president who disagrees and then signs an order allowing trans people to compete.
2) Part of the order also banned granting trans athletes visas to compete in the Olympic games. In that participation in the Olympic games is for now regulated by the individual sport’s governing body, this seems a bit of an overreach as the administration has no say in the Olympic games. (The IOC has somewhat passed the issue to the individual sports but that may change with the upcoming election of new leadership in the IOC.)
3) Trump has also announced that the Department of Education will be initiating an investigation into Penn and San Jose State University (as well as other institutions) into allowing trans people to compete in women’s sports. Not sure that this is a good idea as the universities were in compliance with the rules at the time. It seems wrong to change a rule and then go after people and institutions that were in compliance previously.
The order itself is good and welcomed. Congress needs to address the Title IX aspects of this order and make it law so the next President may not change the order on a whim.
1. Harder to do that when there is legislation in place to protect women from predatory, mentally unstable men.
2. What is happening now in the States is that a great big f88k off light is being shined on the insanity of allowing men to compete as women. Makes it harder for bodies like the IOC to ignore common sense when more and more people around the world see whats happening in America that improves the lives of women.
3. Make those who passed these “laws”, allowing men to complete as women, be held accountable for their actions. Real men would not have allowed this to happen..and all those real men who lost their jobs because of this, well let them at it to to start holding the cucks accountable for their debasement of women and womens sport.
1) Yet Biden’s order and the DOE’s stance was that allowing trans people to compete as part of Title IX. My point is simply that just as Trump changed that interpretation, another president can change it back.
2) Right now the individual sports regulate whether trans athletes can compete in any sanctioned competition – including the Olympics. In short, the IOC as a body “punted” on the issue and passed it down. I don’t believe that Trump has any say into what the IOC or governing bodies decide. If the US allows people into the US to compete, and the governing sport’s body allow trans people to compete, they should be allowed into the country to compete. If the governing bodies want to ruin their sports for women, the consequences will be on their heads. Sale of tickets for their competitions will go down, TV ratings will go down. Income to their sport and the Olympics will go down.
3) I agree that those who voted for this insanity should be held “accountable” for their votes. I would also prefer adding to Title IX to ban trans people from competing in women’s sports by law rather than by executive orders and agency interpretation.
“assigned female at birth”
What an absurd formulation. Doctors/nurses don’t “assign” a person’s sex, they simply note what it is. And this can be determined from conception onwards.
Why not say “biological females”. Much more accurate, and this can be detailed by noting the fact that chromosomes determine sex. “Anyone with one or more Y chromosomes is a biological male and therefore excluded from all women’s and girl’s sports”.
Simple. Clear. Easily testable without having to do anything in any way invasive (hair clippings will do).
I cross that crap out on med forms I get.
Using “biological” before “female” plays into their game. Just male and female. That’s it.
Took long enough.
.
The NCAA should erase all records set by a male Thomas and move all the displaced ranked female competitors up one notch.
If not, female swimmers should compete with a speedboat.
Now:
“We strongly believe that clear, consistent, and uniform eligibility standards would best serve today’s student-athletes instead of a patchwork of conflicting state laws and court decisions.”
Then:
In 2022, the NCAA adopted a policy that allowed individual sports to set eligibility.
So they created that bastardized patchwork through their inability to use common sense, then blamed the states.
Gutless cowards.