Image 01 Image 03

Columbia Law School Rejects Club Formed to Combat Antisemitism

Columbia Law School Rejects Club Formed to Combat Antisemitism

“it is beyond surreal to denounce an organization opposed to antisemitism for adopting the most widely used definition of the term”

Progressive activists showed up at the vote and made sure this didn’t happen. Columbia has a serious problem.

The Boston Globe reports:

At Columbia Law, a club formed to combat antisemitism gets shot down

Long before antisemitism erupted on college campuses last fall, Marie-Alice Legrand knew what hostility to Jews could lead to.

As a young girl growing up in Hamburg, Germany, Legrand could look from her bedroom window onto the bare expanse of the Bornplatz, the site of what was once the city’s largest synagogue. The great Jewish house of worship was torched on Kristallnacht by antisemitic mobs; a few months later the Nazis ordered the Jewish community to demolish what remained of the building and turn over the land to the city. The deportation of Hamburg’s Jews to the death camps began in 1941. In the summer of 1942, the Jewish family that owned what would later become Legrand’s childhood home was murdered in Auschwitz.

Like all schoolchildren in modern Germany, Legrand was taught from an early age about the Holocaust. “I always thought about what those individuals must have gone through,” she told me in a phone conversation Monday. “When we learned about the hatred of the Jews, about the mass murder, I tried hard to relate to the people who were involved.”

A Black German of French Caribbean descent, Legrand went to Paris to study history and management, then moved to New York to earn a law degree at Columbia University. She said she hadn’t expected to become an activist in her final year, but everything changed after Israel was savagely attacked on Oct. 7.

Legrand was shocked when the Columbia campus erupted in “blatant antisemitism and hate,” as she wrote on LinkedIn. Anti-Israel throngs publicly cheered the Hamas atrocities and marched behind banners bearing Palestinian flags and the words “By Any Means Necessary.” A tenured Columbia professor waxed ecstatic over the murders, rapes, and abductions of Israelis, which he called “astounding,” “awesome,” and “victories of the resistance.” More than 140 other faculty members signed a letter defending the barbaric assault as a legitimate “military action” against the Jewish state.

On Jan. 23, Legrand and the group’s other officers appeared before the law school student senate to request official recognition for their club. Such recognition, which is needed to reserve space on campus and be assigned a Columbia email address, is normally a routine formality. Eight other clubs requested approval last month; all eight were rubber-stamped in a few minutes.

Before the vote was held, a delegation of progressive students showed up to demand that Legrand’s group be rejected on the grounds that it would “silence pro-Palestine activists on campus and brand their political speech as antisemitic.” It would do so, they claimed, by adopting the standard definition of antisemitism drafted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. The accusation was ridiculous on multiple grounds. First and most obviously, no voluntary student group has the power to silence anyone, on campus or off. Second, as recent months have made plain, there has been no shortage of pro-Palestine expression on Columbia’s campus.

Above all, it is beyond surreal to denounce an organization opposed to antisemitism for adopting the most widely used definition of the term. The IHRA formulation has been accepted by 42 countries — including the United States — and by well over 1,000 states, provinces, cities, nongovernmental organizations, and corporations. In fact, it is the definition relied on by the federal government in its enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.

In the end, the absurdity of the attack made no difference. For an hour, Legrand and her colleagues were grilled by the student senate. Then, by an anonymous vote, Law Students Against Antisemitism was rejected.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 0 
 
 0
Stuytown | February 8, 2024 at 10:39 am

Dear Jews:

It’s time to leave.

Get your children to Israel.


 
 0 
 
 0
destroycommunism | February 8, 2024 at 4:29 pm

arm yourselves

only travel in packs of no less than 6

vote against lefty policies

they know you are afraid of them

that is their power

stop allowing THAT!!


 
 0 
 
 2
George_Kaplan | February 8, 2024 at 7:51 pm

Since the law school student senate refuses to tolerate opposition to anti-Semitism, is it possible for Legrand etc to simply bypass the bigots and seek approval from the administration instead?

Money talks. Let’s see all those law firms who sent a letter to law school warning that they will not tolerate antisemitism announce, further, that unless the Columbia administration reverses this, they will hire nobody from Columbia.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.