Image 01 Image 03

“A full-blown Color Revolution-style attack on the US Supreme Court as an institution is now in its early stages”

“A full-blown Color Revolution-style attack on the US Supreme Court as an institution is now in its early stages”

A color revolution edging into a hot war on the conservative Justices.

https://youtu.be/IRnmnxVtDqg

“Color Revolution” is a term that has been around for a while and doesn’t have a single clear definition. But the term most famously was used as to the “Orange” Ukraine 2004 civil unrest that allegedly was manipulated by western intelligence agencies to topple a pro-Russia regime. A color revolution then, is a form of manipulated mass civil disobediance meant to accomplish regime change.

We saw it used against Trump after the 2016 election, where manipulated and hysterical claims of Russia collusion were used to attempt to paralyze the Trump administration under the umbrella of “The Resistance” – and it worked well in stymying many of Trump’s planned initiatives. It all was highly organized and manipulated. What has been happening in Israel regarding judicial reform also is a form of color revolution, where organized mass protests against the recently-elected right wing coalition led by Benjamin Netanyahu paralyzed the country, and even the military, all with the purpose of overthrowing the democratically elected goverment.

There also is a type of color revolution being waged against the Supreme Court now that it has a conservative majority. Michael Waller tweeted:

“A full-blown Color Revolution-style attack on the US Supreme Court as an institution is now in its early stages.”

I agree that Color Revolution probably is an appropriate term for the years-long and accelerating attempt by Democrats to delegitimize the Supreme Court. You could trace the history back to the “Borking” of Reagan nominee Robert Bork, but certainly to the savaging of Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearings.

Democrats are launching a campaign to reopen and revisit the Kavanaugh confirmation. They can’t do that legally, but they want to further increase the pressure on Kavanaugh — the person who was almost assassinated due to Democrat and media incitement.

It’s part of a broad activist and Democrat campaign against all the conservative Justices, including Justice Thomas and his wife, Chief Justice Roberts and his wife, and Justices Alito, Kavanaugh, and Barrett (to a lesser degree).

Among the SCOTUS-related stories that major outlets have broken in the last few weeks:

– Washington Post discovered that Clarence Thomas has been declaring income from “Ginger Holdings LLC” instead of “Ginger Limited Partnership” since 2006.

– CNN discovered that a company Harlan Crow’s family had a minority interest in was involved in a case that SCOTUS declined to consider. Crow & his company had no involvement in the case.

– Politico discovered that Justice Gorsuch correctly declared the sale of his portion of an LLC that sold property to a partner at a law firm. That partner never met Gorsuch and is a big Dem donor.

– Business Insider discovered that Justice Roberts’ wife is a successful recruiter for major law firms. None of her recruits have ever argued before SCOTUS.

If you don’t realize this is an intentional and coordinated campaign aimed directly at delegitimizing the SCOTUS majority, I don’t know what to tell you.

Chuck Schumer has openly incited violence:

The threats against conservative Justices contininue such that Justice Alito was unable to attend a lecture at Scalia Law School because of security concerns, as he told The Wall Street Journal:

Justice Samuel Alito was supposed to speak to law students at George Mason University in Arlington, Va., but when they showed up, he wasn’t there. “That Alito was speaking via closed circuit from a room at the Supreme Court seven miles away, rather than in person, was a sign these are not normal times,” the Washington Post reported. The Post didn’t explain what made the “times” abnormal.

It wasn’t a lingering fear of Covid-19. In a mid-April interview in his chambers, Justice Alito fills us in on the May 12, 2022, event: “Our police conferred with the George Mason Police and the Arlington Police and they said, ‘It’s not a good idea. He shouldn’t come here. . . . The security problems will be severe.’ So I ended up giving the speech by Zoom,” he says. “Still, there were so many protesters and they were so loud that you could hear them.” ….

That campaign [against the conservative Justices] included unlawful assemblies outside justices’ homes, and that wasn’t the worst of it. “Those of us who were thought to be in the majority, thought to have approved my draft opinion, were really targets of assassination,” Justice Alito says. “It was rational for people to believe that they might be able to stop the decision in Dobbs by killing one of us.” On June 8, an armed man was arrested outside the home of Justice Brett Kavanaugh; the suspect was later charged with attempted assassination and has pleaded not guilty.

Make no mistake about it, this is a deliberate campaign to stoke violent attacks on the conservative Justices at a minimum to intimidate them. No wonder the media memory-holed the attempted assassination of Justice Kavanaugh.

So maybe what we are witnessing is more than a color revolution against the Supreme Court. We’re witnessing a color revolution on the edge of a hot war on the conservative Justices.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

The real world Pelican Brief playing out. They have to achieve this color revolution before the 2024 election. Considering the players….FBI, CIA, NSA, DOJ, DNC…etc etc,,, they have had practice and success. Seeing the cover given to protesters at the justices’ houses, plenty of conspirators to pull it off…. in the name of their “precious democracy”.

    REDACTED in reply to alaskabob. | April 29, 2023 at 11:02 pm

    there is no middle ground left in America

    And we must not forget that Christina Ford got away with in-your-face perjury during the Kavanaugh nomination hearings.
    As evil as the communist party usa (aka the democrat party) is, it is no more so than the republican party. That the gopers did not charge Ford with perjury was not because it has the moral high ground, but because it is a party of cowards. We’ve been seeing this for years. The communists commit all manner of crimes, but the gopers never have them prosecuted.
    For but one old example, during the 2000 election, some black students at Florida’s Edward Waters College voted twice–from home, and from school. Did the gop have them prosecuted? Not at all. Meanwhile, the democrats, black supremacists, and dnc media (assuming one can distinguish among the three) foisted a Big Lie on the nation: that White supremacists had stopped blacks from voting in Florida.

There seems to be increasing evidence supporting your conclusion. The DOJ is certainly playing its part by doing nothing.

    Dathurtz in reply to Q. | April 29, 2023 at 7:36 am

    I think you are optimistic in your view that they are doing nothing.

    panamapat in reply to Q. | May 3, 2023 at 8:50 am

    The DOJ is nothing but a bunch of thugs doing the dirty work of the organized crime syndicate masquerading as the Democratic Party. Once, you understand this you know how to deal with them.

George_Kaplan | April 28, 2023 at 9:18 pm

What happens if the Left inspires the assassination of a non-Left member of SCOTUS, then tries to use its Senate majority to replace the non-Leftist with a Democrat apparatchik?

Would there be any legal way to prevent the coup?

    CommoChief in reply to George_Kaplan. | April 28, 2023 at 9:47 pm

    Potentially a true talking filibuster not the pretend filibusters that are more common. A smallish group of Senators gain recognition and refuse to yield the floor except to each other, a dozen could do it easily nearly indefinitely but need to do it before any motion about the nomination comes to the floor. That way there isn’t a filibuster ‘of’ the nomination but one which precedes it in order to game the rule change on breaking a nominal filibuster for a nomination.

    starride in reply to George_Kaplan. | April 28, 2023 at 11:11 pm

    Personally I think that would start a very bad chain of events that would include several senators in its wake..

    nordic prince in reply to George_Kaplan. | April 29, 2023 at 12:07 am

    What makes you think they haven’t already done such a thing?

This country doesn’t have a prayer of continuing as 50 states. The treason within is overwhelming, the scale of corruption is imassive (and worse: institutionalized), and a gigantic number of our citizens are either mentally ill or criminals (street and white collar both).

Most frightening is that our military is gone: its guns will find their way pointed towards us sooner than you think.

Our only hope as individuals and family people is to get the hell out of Dodge: we have to secede.

    its guns will find their way pointed towards us sooner than you think

    I think that’s why (other than sheer idiocy) Granholm is proposing the military go EV. The limitations of EVs aren’t so problematic if you expect only domestic action. Expect to see calls from Democrats for Posse Comitatus to be repealed.

      buck61 in reply to randian. | April 29, 2023 at 12:31 am

      The defense contractors should be open revolt of this, the domestic defense contractors also supply much of the world with weaponry and equipment, I have serious doubts that their foreign customers would be in the market to buy an all electric fleet, they already have issues with not enough electricity. Are we going to see a tsunami of corporate welfare to the defense contractors to built new plants or repurpose existing plants?
      Will other countries just find new vendors for their military equipment?

      Pettifogger in reply to randian. | May 1, 2023 at 9:13 am

      I don’t see them bothering to repeal Posse Comitatus. They’ll just ignore it. They seem to have a different conception of “law.”

Not just the SCOTUS. It’s a wider assault on any institution or person not under the thumb of leftist ideologues. No dissent is tolerated from any prominent or powerful voice.

I do agree that the fury the left holds b/c they lost their grip on the CT is not like any other. Even losing their four decade hold on the HoR in 94 does not compare. They loved control of the CT b/c it was an expedient way to notch policy wins without having to do the hard work of getting a legislative majority and a Presidential signature. They didn’t have to defend those wins to the voters they used the CT to magic them into existence b/c they could; see Roe.

Not to mention the way they lost control of SCOTUS; RBG refusing to follow ‘suggestions’ to retire then DJT defeating HRC and making three appointments they still believe belong to them and were cheated out of. Which is, IMO, reflected in their fury about Dobbs.

The reality is that conservatives are intellectually ill-equipped to fight back. Principle holds them back. Alito, for instance, should not have come forward and said he believes he knows who the leaker is but declines to name the person for lack of a sufficient level of evidence.. He should have just leaked the name of the person anonymously, like the unprincipled left would do.

    randian in reply to Concise. | April 28, 2023 at 11:45 pm

    Alito is foolishly thinking like a lawyer. It shouldn’t matter that you don’t have proof “beyond a reasonable doubt”. Evidence for this kind of corruption isn’t about criminal indictment it’s about institutional stability.

    Whitewall in reply to Concise. | April 29, 2023 at 9:55 am

    Exactly. This has been a problem since the 1950s. ‘Principle’ is usually the Republican way to spell loser. Partisan fighting may be over principle, but we are way beyond that. We are in an ideological warfare situation rapidly entering ideological elimination phase. The plain divide is simple: we on the right are a threat to Democrats power and control. Democrats power is a threat to our freedom and Republic. This may be a fight to the finish

    rebelgirl in reply to Concise. | April 30, 2023 at 9:50 am

    Alito should leak the name to someone so it makes it way out there..it won’t matter anyway if fingers get pointed at him for doing so..

I’d enjoy seeing the whirlwind visit Schumer. I’d enjoy that a LOT.

I’ve posted this warning at this blog and others: “We are at war. Prepare accordingly.”

Ooooo, look. The NFL draft!

Sometimes, I can forget why I loathe the left. Now I remember.

Seems to me that if SCOTUS is delegitimized, and the court is packed, Red America will be under no obligation to comply with any of its rulings. I don’t think lefties have thought this through at all.

    randian in reply to MarkJ. | April 28, 2023 at 11:46 pm

    They have thought it through, and knows the right will comply even if they think SCOTUS illegitimate.

    iconotastic in reply to MarkJ. | April 29, 2023 at 11:12 am

    The obligation will be enforced by men with guns. Tens of thousands of armed federal agents will happily murder anyone defying court orders. Individuals grunting out ‘molon labe’ or other slogans will be easily defeated individually.

    CommoChief in reply to DDsModernLife. | April 29, 2023 at 7:13 pm

    The d/prog adjusted their strategy and now out raise the GOP from big donors. See the contributions from financial sector flowing to d/prog in much larger amounts than to GoP. The d/prog are now more corporatist than the GoP of the 1990s and reap the contributions b/c of it. They love the idea of a big govt/big corporation/big union power conglomerate b/c it is easier and tidier to regulate and control bigger entities v a bunch of smaller more independent minded entities or individuals.

    carolmcl in reply to DDsModernLife. | May 1, 2023 at 10:53 pm

    But, they sure learned how to use it! And exploit it.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/05/richard-poe/how-the-british-invented-color-revolutions/ “How the British Invented Color Revolutions”

According to this article, former Trump aide Darren Beattie on the Tucker Carlson show in September of 2020 called the unfolding coup against Trump a “Color Revolution”. He defined it as “a regime change model favored by many in our national security apparatus” that uses “an engineered, contested election scenario” to disrupt and override legitimate elections. The article said that “when Beattie warned of a ‘color revolution’ against Trump, he broke a fearsome taboo. The last person who tried to expose color revolutions on national TV was Glenn Beck in 2010” and “Fox News cancelled Beckes show soon after.” Tucker Carlson was clearly headed in that direction when he was fired, too.

Now here is the part I find particularly interesting. Beattie said that US government’s national security apparatus was funding these revolutions through US NGOs and pointed to a group known as “Atlanticists”, “jargon for a person who puts British interests over American ones.” Moreover, they put US and UK interests (the “Atlantic Community”) above everyone else.

And according to the article, guess who coined the term “Atlantic Community”? Fabian Socialist Walter Lippman, in 1917. And he had a “British handler named Norman Angell, a Fabian became “an ‘unofficial member’ of the editorial board of Lippmann’s magazine, The New Republic.”

The article says “Lippmann is widely hailed as the inventor of Atlanticism. On February 17, 1917, he wrote an article for The New Republic, titled “In Defense of the Atlantic World.” It was an open call for war. Lippmann argued that America must stand with the ‘Western world’ against the barbarous hordes of the East. … snip … Lippmann’s article supposedly kicked off the Atlanticist movement.” Fabian Socialists started all this chaos.

The article next says that “British leaders at the turn of the 20th century recognized that England could no longer afford to police its global empire. They formed a plan to transfer the cost of empire to the United States.  The plan was for the Americans to police the world, at their own expense, while Britain would call the shots, retaining control of imperial policy.”

To that end, a group called the Round Table, funded by the Rhodes Trust, was formed and “from roughly 1909 to 1945, the Round Table gradually drew the United States into a web of interdependency with Britain.  This was done, first, by establishing The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in 1921, to exercise backchannel control over U.S. foreign policy.”

It’s worth noting that Edward House, who was President Wilson’s closest friend and advisor, was a key participant in the establishment of the CFR. By all appearances, both House and Wilson were Fabian Socialists. 

Then article says that other “transnational entities” (such as the UN and NATO) were then formed to bind “the U.S. to Britain’s fate.”

Again, as an aside, note that many Fabians (including Eleanor Roosevelt and FDR) pushed the formation of these organizations. In 1941, FDR and the Churchill (who was also influenced by Fabian Socialists … such as Clement Attlee) signed a document called the Atlantic Charter, which set out American and British goals for the world after the end of World War II.

Then 1942 a document known as the United Nations Declaration was signed by 26 nations to uphold the Atlantic Charter. And that document led to the establishment of the UN, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, NATO, and the World Bank. In short, the rudiments of the World Government that the Fabian Society envisioned.

Now maybe the British have lost control but it sure looks to me like Fabians are still calling the shots. Keep in mind that the Round Table was a Fabian construct and when Bill Clinton (a Rhode Scholar) became President, he filled his administration was many Rhode Scholars (such a Strobe Talbot, Robert Reich, Derek Shearer, Ira Magaziner, Susan Rice, and George Stephanopolous). It seems that every direction you turn in this story, you find Fabian Socialists at the heart of it.. And Beattie and Richard Poe make an interesting case that the folks behind the attacks on Trump and Trumpism are British because both are a threat to “the plan”.

    fscarn in reply to BeAChooser. | April 29, 2023 at 12:34 pm

    Right on. All of this is a piece to fashion the NWO. The purpose of WWI was to demonstrate the need for “international peace” (which is code for the NWO). The League of Nations was the first attempt. But only as an attempt because the “prize capture” chose not to enter. But it was a close call. The US Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles, on 11/19/1919, voting 38-53.

    As the commentator notes, the CFR was incorporated shortly thereafter, as a NY corporation, in 1921, for the purpose of changing American opinion & attitudes from independence and sovereignty to one where Americans would be willing to cede their sovereignty to an international body. The wealthiest of the wealthy were the founders of the CFR. The CFR has never waived from this intent. As proof, look at all the international bodies where the USA has given up its independence (all without the express consent of Americans). The UN, WHO, NAFTA, UNESCO, UNICEF, and on and on.

    https://www.amazon.com/Shadows-Power-Council-Relations-American/dp/0882791346

    By the mid-1930s the CFR had captured the State Department. Every key appointee to State since, regardless of whether a D or R administration, has been a CFR member or someone closely associated with the CFR in other ways. This explains why the USA has followed disastrous foreign policies time after time.

    So another attempt, again through world war, was engineered. And engineered is the right word. Think about it. In 1919, a lone, unemployed WWI veteran ekes out his living painting street scenes of Vienna. Less than 14 years later, he’s the Chancellor of Germany.

    https://www.amazon.com/Wall-Street-Rise-Hitler-Astonishing/dp/1905570279

    With the end of WWII the insider elite got what they wanted all along, the League of Nations with the prize at last captured. The UN Participation Act of 1945, Pub. L. 79-264, was signed into law on 12/20/1945.

    Repealing the UN Participation Act would be a first step in following Washington’s wise advice of avoiding foreign entanglements.

      BeAChooser in reply to fscarn. | April 29, 2023 at 2:02 pm

      All true although my point was that the Fabian Society is behind this. That they are still the ones that we must defeat and that will only happen when the public knows about them … their origin, goals and influence on America..

      Unfortunately, the past hundred years there’s been a deliberate effort to keep Fabianism out of the public eye (it’s part of their plan).. It’s not even mentioned in our schools even through arguably Fabianism has had far, far, far more impact on America than Marxism, which they do cover extensively, Go check out encyclopedias. They spend many, many, many times as much space talking about Marxism and barely mention Fabian Socialism … and even then they are dishonest.

      Look at the description of the Fabian Society in the Encylopedia Britanica (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/199691/Fabian-Society ).  That alone tells you why.   It’s just 392 words long (go compare that to the description of Marxism … over 10000 words long).   And it doesn’t mention the society’s communist roots or its infiltration of American politics at all.  

      Ask yourself if this is not deliberate strategy to keep the movement below the radar.   Did your school education ever include mention of Fabian socialism.  Apparently not.  And who controls the curriculum of the schools?  Think about that.  Has the media done an expose on Fabian Socialism?  No.   And who controls the media?  Think about that. It’s been a deliberate strategy to keep people from hearing about Fabian Socialism.

      That is our real enemy in this struggle.

      andypep in reply to fscarn. | May 1, 2023 at 12:21 pm

      What Independence are you talking about?
      The independence to have a beer in the 1930’s?
      Or the independence to own gold when the government ordered all Americans to sell their gold at the price they set also in the 30’s?
      Was it your independence when the natives were exterminated?
      What about keeping slavery 60 years after the British policed the world ending the trade?
      Was it Americans Independence keeping segregation into the 1960’s?
      What about taking over Texas? Or Florida? Or Colorado? Or California? Or Iraq?

      Americans have no independence but they are so indoctrinated with “amendments” “constitution” “Freedom of speech” they are blind to the truth that all they have is wealth. That wealth comes from the natural resources that any massive land mass has.
      STOP talking a good job and maybe humble yourselves and look outside at the rest of the world. The fake history is designed to keep you from doing anything.
      Joe Biden isn’t any different from 99% of your presidents. If Americans don’t stop looking down on the rest of the world as though it was them that have financed regime changes and wars worldwide for at least the last 100 years they’ll have another 100 years of fake freedom and sorry, they’ll bloody well deserve it.
      Being patriotic doesn’t mean agreeing with crimes against humanity because they’ve been committed by Americans.

        BeAChooser in reply to andypep. | May 1, 2023 at 6:47 pm

        “What Independence are you talking about?
The independence to have a beer in the 1930’s?
Or the independence to own gold when the government ordered all Americans to sell their gold at the price they set also in the 30’s?
Was it your independence when the natives were exterminated?
What about keeping slavery 60 years after the British policed the world ending the trade?
Was it Americans Independence keeping segregation into the 1960’s?
What about taking over Texas? Or Florida? Or Colorado? Or California? Or Iraq?”

        So you’re not American (or at least don’t consider yourself one) and you don’t like America. Got it.

        “Americans have no independence but they are so indoctrinated with “amendments” “constitution” “Freedom of speech” they are blind to the truth that all they have is wealth. That wealth comes from the natural resources that any massive land mass has.“

        First of all, Americans do have a lot of independence and freedoms. Not as much as we used to have. The problem is the left has been working for over a hundred years to take it away. Even more recently.

        Second, America’s wealth didn’t just come from our natural resources. It took our freedom, our outlook on progress, and market oriented, capitalistic economic philosophy to unleash the growth that the world soon envied. And many countries much smaller than us, with almost no natural resources … Japan. Germany. Korea. Taiwan. to name but a few, have similar wealth precisely because they then emulated (often with our help) both many aspects of our form of governnent and our economics.

        “Joe Biden isn’t any different from 99% of your presidents.”

        LOL! We conservatives have certainly become aware that a lot of recent presidents haven’t been what they pretended to be, but to claim that Biden is like a Kennedy, a Reagan, a Bush, or even a Clinton is nonsense. Obama and Biden (who by the way isn’t the one running the government … it’s probably Obama, and the Fabianesque puppeteers behind him) are in a class of their own.

        “If Americans don’t stop looking down on the rest of the world as though it was them that have financed regime changes and wars worldwide for at least the last 100 years they’ll have another 100 years of fake freedom and sorry, they’ll bloody well deserve it.”

        I don’t think you understand at all what fscarn and I are really saying. And I don’t think either of us look down upon the rest of the world. I, for one, support Trump in part because he didn’t start any new wars during his term.

        “Being patriotic doesn’t mean agreeing with crimes against humanity because they’ve been committed by Americans.”

        And where did either of us defend American sponsored crimes against humanity”. Care to point that out? And which crimes specifically do you wish to discuss?

        carolmcl in reply to andypep. | May 1, 2023 at 10:55 pm

        Good job on putting out all the left’s talking points. 👏👏👏

    andypep in reply to BeAChooser. | May 1, 2023 at 11:40 am

    It amazes me how so many Americans have fallen for the Britain is really controlling the world narrative.
    I bet you think the empire was created with Britain invading countries, don’t you? Mutual cooperation by invitation except America where they spent 150 developing and protecting the country(They lost 20,000 men protecting the country when the French dictatorship invaded to take over in the French and Indian war that ended in 1766. Britain was nearly bankrupt yet you believe the war for independence was about no taxation without representation.
    Britain saved the country so they repaid them by killing another 20,000 is the other extreme but it is probably somewhere in the middle.
    For 150 years Britain left the natives pretty much alone the in 15 years the free country had exterminated millions of them. Then the invasions for Texas, California, Florida, Colorado yet you refuse to see the truth and that is why you’ve just allowed 1 million to be killed in Iraq with your money whilst pointing fingers at anybody but an American.
    When you lot gonna wake up?
    The bad people doing the bad things are just American by name. We know they don’t represent the other 99.999% of Americans . Until you admit the crimes and genocides you can’t repent nor fix the reasons why they keep committing the atrocities paid for by your tax dollars?
    Talk a good job but that is it. America had vaccine mandates before any other country in the world. Americans did NOTHING. Canadians opposed them but you can’t see how constantly harping on about Constitution, blah blah blah is stopping you from doing anything.
    Oh, here’s a tip. If Google shows you the article on page 1 you can guarantee it’s a distraction and false.
    Indoctrinated hate for Britain is powerful though so you’ll forgive them this time.
    WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND.

      BLBeamer in reply to andypep. | May 1, 2023 at 6:22 pm

      Lot’s of…eccentric… views on the US but you have your Texas history wrong. The government of Mexico invited American colonists to settle in Texas which was part of Mexican Territory at that time. Over time the Mexican government proved to be unpalatable for many of the settlers so they declared independence. Mexico fought to keep Texas territory Mexican, but Mexico lost that war. This resulted in Texas being an independent republic for a short time until Texas agreed to be annexed into the United States during the James K. Polk administration.

      carolmcl in reply to andypep. | May 1, 2023 at 10:58 pm

      One man posts the theory that Britain controls U.S. and suddenly we Americans have all fallen for it? No. Some of us know it’s the WEF types from all over the world, trying their darndest.

        BeAChooser in reply to carolmcl. | May 1, 2023 at 11:15 pm

        “One man posts the theory that Britain controls U.S.”

        That is not what I concluded. As I said, I think the British have lost control of the process they started. A process that led to the WEF types, who all think a lot like Fabian Socialists, even if they don’t acknowledge being Fabians.

      BeAChooser in reply to andypep. | May 1, 2023 at 11:08 pm

      “It amazes me how so many Americans have fallen for the Britain is really controlling the world narrative.”

      Hardly any, actually. In fact, America would be far better off if more Americans did appreciate how much influence British Fabian Socialism has had on our country … detrimentally so … since the time that Sidney Webb toured our universities spreading his socialist gospel. Starting with Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, one US president after another has been influenced by Fabian Socialists. Some were likely Fabians. And Fabians thinking has had and still has a dramatic effect on India, Australia, New Zealand and many other countries that were once part of the British empire.

      But no, I don’t think at this point the British are controlling the world narrative because I think they’ve lost control of what some small portion of them once started. Certainly most British citizens are as much victims of what they started as the rest of us.

      “I bet you think the empire was created with Britain invading countries, don’t you?”

      The British empire was created by the same forces that enlarged America … a capitalistic market economy, strong individualism, a Judeo-Christian outlook, and the discover of lots of essentially empty land or at least land held by far less technologically proficient peoples. With their Navy and Army, the British took possession of many lands around the world in the name of the Crown. Then treated those lands like their own, plundering their resources. Don’t think for one minute the British were any better than the US at that time the US rebelled.

      “America where they spent 150 developing and protecting the country(They lost 20,000 men protecting the country when the French dictatorship invaded to take over in the French and Indian war that ended in 1766. Britain was nearly bankrupt yet you believe the war for independence was about no taxation without representation. Britain saved the country so they repaid them by killing another 20,000 is the other extreme but it is probably somewhere in the middle.”

      I guess we know where you hail from now. And clearly you haven’t gotten over the American Revolution. You must enjoy seeing Biden damage our country.

      “For 150 years Britain left the natives pretty much alone the in 15 years the free country had exterminated millions of them.”

      What a load of hooey. According to https://allthatsinteresting.com/pilgrim-plagues, “historians estimate that 18 million indigenous people inhabited” North America “before the 16th century. But within years of European Settlers arriving, these populations would be decimated by up to 90 percent, killed by the diseases that colonists brought with them to the New World.”

      When the first English explorers and then soon settlers arrived in New England, there were at least 60,000 Native Americans in the region. Almost immediately diseases began to decimate the natives. Take, for example, the experience of the Wampanoag, which was a confederation of 24 tribes that lived in southeastern Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket. They’d lived on that land for 10000 years and their population is thought to have been about 12,000 at the time England arrived.

      The first contacts with these natives wasn’t nearly as benevolent as you might portray. Take for example, the story of Squanto. You’re heard of him, right? He’s the native that showed the Pilgrims how to plant corn. Squanto was a member of the Patuxet tribe, a branch of the Wampanoag, and indeed, before the 1600s, before English settlers arrived, the Patuxet people generally had friendly contact with Europeans.

      But in 1614, British Captain Thomas Hunt anchored his ship in the harbor where Squanto’s village was and Plymouth colony would soon be founded. Hunt invited over 20 members of the tribe on board his ship with the lure of metal tools, jewelry and cloth. Squanto was one of them. But instead of trading, Hunt captured them and sailed off. Hunt then did the same thing at another Wampanoag site, capturing another 7 natives. Then he sailed to Europe and sold them in Spain as slaves. The British were so benevolent.

      Squanto somehow managed to escape to England, learned English, then returned to the New England Colonies as an interpreter for English Captain Thomas Dermer. When they arrived at Squanto’s village, they found the native population gone, wiped out by a disease that the English we know know had brought with them. The disease was leptospirosis, which likely came to America via non-native black rats infesting European ships.

      The natives called what happened “The Great Dying”. The English called it “Indian Fever”. It first showed up in Maine in 1616, when English explorer Richard Vines noted that the coast of Maine was “sorely afflicted by the Plague … snip … left void of inhabitants.” The plague spread south and in 1628, killed thousands of Wampanoag along the Massachusetts shoreline. Researchers estimate that 9 out of 10 indigenous people infected with the disease between 1616 and 1619 died. A gift from the English.

      By the time Squanto returned, relations between the British and natives was so bad that in 1620, Dermer and his crew were attacked by Wampanoag near Martha’s vineyard. Only Dermer, Squanto and 14 of Dermer’s crew escaped. They return to Maine, where Squanto left the ship. Dermer and his men then visited the Pokanoket and Nesmasket tribes of the Wampanoag … and were captured. You getting the idea, … the British weren’t on good terms with the natives even before the Pilgrims arrived.

      Dermer and his men escaped, then continued on to Martha’s Vineyard where they met Nauset leader Epenow, who was previously enslaved by Dermer’s employer. Dermer then sailed on to Jamestown to winter, then a year later returned to Maine and picked up Squanto.

      Then they sailed back to Martha’s Vineyard … where they were attacked by Epenow and his followers, because Epenow fears that Dermer’s employer wants to enslave him again. Most of Dermer’s crew is killed. Dermer makes it back to Virginia where he dies of wounds. Squanto is captured and now viewed as a prisoner by the Wampanoag. As you can see, there was little peace and friendship between the English and natives. The English weren’t invited guests.

      In the fall of 1620 Squanto, still a prisoner, was transferred to the village of Pokanoket, whose chief was Massasoit. That December the Pilgrims arrived but unlike the account told children, the natives who attempted to befriend the English were captured. Eventually, Squanto, acting as an interpreter for chief Massasoit, managed to negotiate an agreement with the Pilgrims ending the hostility … for a time. But in the winter of 1622, according to Pilgrim Edward Winslow, Squanto begins sowing distrust between the Pilgrims and natives. Maybe as revenge for what Hunt did to him. Later the year, Squanto dies from “Indian Fever” and relations never do return to that golden ago of 1621.

      In fact, the truth is that the English showed no hesitation in taking over more of the Native American lands. Within 50 years, poor relations between the English settlers and Wamganoag resulted in King Philip’s War. The war that lasted a little over a year and ended with the destruction of the Wampanoag, Nipmuc, Pocumtuc, and Narragansett tribes. About 40 percent of the surviving Wampanoag were killed and the English sold many of the survivors into slavery. The truth is that the English were no better than the Americans after the revolution. But maybe your English schools didn’t teach you that?

      “that is why you’ve just allowed 1 million to be killed in Iraq”

      LOL! You have a seriously skewed view of the facts. A million people didn’t die in Iraq because of the US … if at all. You are way too trusting of the numbers for leftist sources like the Lancet. And Saddam’s government had a lot to do with what death there was in Iraq, before, during and after the war. So did Iran. And all of that happened while Germany, France and maybe England did nothing … except supply Saddam with arms.

      The objective in our invading Iraq was to end a regime who’d killed millions of Iraqis, a regime that was involved in terrorist attacks throughout the world, a regime that knew about the coming attack on the US by al-Qaeda and did nothing to prevent it.

      We invaded to do what we did in Germany and Japan, two countries you’d admit greatly benefited from our *invasions* if you were remotely honest. Unfortunately, leftists, led by Obama, who Europeans greatly admire, prevented that outcome. He cut and run, and that led to even more instability and death in Iraq … and Afghanistan. But at least Saddam is gone. Do you wish he were still around and nuclear armed?

      “Until you admit the crimes and genocides you can’t repent nor fix the reasons why they keep committing the atrocities paid for by your tax dollars?”

      LOL! You really don’t have a clue about my views, do you? I bet you don’t like Trump, either. Tell me, were you an American, who would you vote for in the next election? Just curious.

      “America had vaccine mandates before any other country in the world. Americans did NOTHING. Canadians opposed them but you can’t see how constantly harping on about Constitution, blah blah blah is stopping you from doing anything.”

      First of all, MANY American opposed the mandates. But what would you suggest we have done? What I’ve suggested, perhaps? Use the 2nd Amendment the way it was intended? At least we still have the possibility of that, thanks to our Constitution that you demean.. Your British and Canadians (you’re one of them, right?), who are now more controlled by the socialists in your governments than we are, don’t. You don’t have a 2nd Amendment and your populace doesn’t have the guns to do what it would take to free yourselves anyway. You folks don’t even talk about the possibility, like we do in this country. The only way you’re ever going to get free again, is if America rids itself of these communists and that comes save you butt … a second time. 🙂

      “Oh, here’s a tip. If Google shows you the article on page 1 you can guarantee it’s a distraction and false.”

      Seriously, who do you think you’re talking too? You think I believe what the MSM report? I’m here because I do look behind the curtain. Why are you here? To attack people like me?

      “Indoctrinated hate for Britain”

      I don’t hate Britain. But the British did create Fabian Socialism and help spread it around the world. Maybe YOU should do a little research on that and then we can discuss this issue. Until then, I suggest you find someone else’s views to misrepresent.

It’s gonna get worse before it gets better. I really don’t think our country can be returned to, well, any type of a free society without violence.

    Whitewall in reply to Dathurtz. | April 29, 2023 at 9:22 am

    The continued existence of the Democrat Party is ultimately the main threat to our Republic. It always has been.

Steven Brizel | April 29, 2023 at 11:03 pm

This is an Democratic organized attempt at suppression of dissent

I never understood what it was about Kavanaugh in particular that gets their nickers all in a twist.

    It’s not Kavanaugh, personally, it would have been the same no matter who the nominee because to them that is, was, and will always be “their” seat. It was a (mostly) leftie seat (with Kennedy often voting left), so it “belonged” to them. They were upset about the Garland thing because they wanted to widen their advantage after Scalia died, but they weren’t hell-bent on it since it was essentially a wash (a conservative replacing a conservative). BUT when Kennedy retired, they saw the court slipping away, and they had relied on it for decades to legislate when they couldn’t in Congress. That’s what it was and is about: that seat swung the Court right.

      Sultan in reply to Fuzzy Slippers. | May 1, 2023 at 9:43 am

      Kennedy?

      BeAChooser in reply to Fuzzy Slippers. | May 1, 2023 at 11:21 pm

      “It’s not Kavanaugh, personally, it would have been the same no matter who the nominee”

      That’s right, but I think for a slightly different reason. They oppose any nominee by Trump because Trumpism is an existential threat to the UNIPARTY. Still is.

        Wait, so you believe they would have been happy with a President Cruz nominee? Come on, that’s ludicrous.

          BeAChooser in reply to Fuzzy Slippers. | May 2, 2023 at 11:30 am

          The topic was whether any nominee that Trump made would have been treated differently than Kavanaugh. I didn’t say anything about Cruz? Of course they wouldn’t have been happy if Cruz had been elected President instead of Trump. He might have posed much the same existential threat to them. Please, stop trying to toss strawmen at me.

          Yeah, no. You stated that it was all about Trump and “Trumpism,” so yes, it’s fair to point out that had Cruz won instead of Trump in ’16, they would have had and be having the exact same meltdown over Kavanaugh. It’s losing the SUPREME COURT they are upset about, not who nominated him (any Republican would have nominated Kavanaugh; that was the whole point of Trump letting everyone know his SCOTUS list ahead of time, to show that it was legit).

midge.hammer | April 30, 2023 at 2:28 pm

The Left has done a masterful job of controlling the narrative, correctly noted above due more than anything to a willingness to discard ‘principle’ while knowing that is the Right’s very foundation.

The choreography of J6 and its aftermath could hardly have gone better for them.

I see in the comments above I’m not the only one who realizes our days are numbered, that violence and a new Dark Age are all but upon us.

What did you do, *personally*, about it today? Is your spiritual house in order? Are you eating foods that make you stronger? Or those that poison you? Did you get enough sleep? Are you strengthening or weakening your body by your actions or inactions? At the end of today, will you be more ready or less ready from a knowledge-and-skills standpoint to thrive and lead when the SHTF? Are your pen and your sword sharper or more dull?

If YOU are not worth a damn, or not worth more of a damn than you were yesterday, then you are worth less of a damn. And if you are worth less, who will follow? Who would you *want* to follow you?

Are you ready? It’s coming. Your family. Your friends. Neighbors. Community. Are they ready?

What CAN
MAY
SHOULD
MUST
YOU
DO
TODAY?

And the 35-years long attempted lynching of Clarence Thomas continues apace, and again with Biden in the driver’s seat.

Steven Brizel | May 1, 2023 at 8:45 am

This is clearly an attempt to intimidate any view that differs from the Democrats. Notice the absence of any ethical concerns about RBG’s off the court activities and opinions.It should be noted that Republicans raised ethical issues about Justice Fortas and raised eyebrows about Justice Douglas’affairs with his clerks but nothing in the way of open intimidation of the court for being very liberal during the halycon years of the Warren Court

Ninth Dimension | May 1, 2023 at 8:51 am

I’ve been wondering whether the George Floyd riots were a color revolution. They were clearly orchestrated and amply funded. And on cue, the Dem establishment turned them into a religious ritual.