Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Molotov Cocktail Lawyers Plead Guilty to Reduced Charges, Likely Will Get Only Two-Year Sentences

Molotov Cocktail Lawyers Plead Guilty to Reduced Charges, Likely Will Get Only Two-Year Sentences

“Under revised agreements, the defendants were charged with conspiracy to commit arson and possess an explosive device, with prosecutors recommending sentences of 18 to 24 months.”

EDNY photos okay to use

The two former lawyers who threw a Molotov cocktail at a police car during the George Floyd riots have pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges and are expected to receive reduced sentences.

As we noted previously, they were originally facing a much harsher sentence.

Jarryd Jaeger reports at the Post Millennial:

Lawyers who torched NYPD vehicle during summer of 2020 plead guilty to conspiracy charges

Two former New York lawyers who threw Molotov cocktails at an NYPD vehicle during the George Floyd riots have pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges.

In June 2020 during George Floyd protests in Brooklyn, two New York lawyers were captured on security footage firebombing an unoccupied NYPD cruiser and handing out Molotov cocktails to people in the neighborhood.

On Thursday, the pair pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges after negotiating with prosecutors, who had originally sought a more serious charge under a “terrorism enhancement” that could have landed them in jail for a decade.

According to Reuters, now former lawyers Urooj Rahman and Colinford Mattis plead guilty to charges of conspiracy to commit arson and possession of an explosive device.

You can read the “Superseding Information” document here, which is the government’s way of dropping the other charges.

Here’s more from the Reuters report:

Urooj Rahman, 33, and Colinford Mattis, 34, had pleaded guilty last October to possessing a destructive device and expressed regret, but fought federal prosecutors’ effort to brand them as terrorists, more than doubling their potential sentences to 10 years.

Under revised agreements, the defendants were charged with conspiracy to commit arson and possess an explosive device, with prosecutors recommending sentences of 18 to 24 months.

They entered pleas to the new charges before U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan in Brooklyn, and said they understood they would lose their law licenses as a result of their guilty pleas.

“I wish I had made different and better choices that night,” Mattis told Cogan. Rahman also said she regretted her actions…

In a court filing last month, prosecutors said 18- to 24-month terms reflected the “nature and circumstances of the offense and the histories and personal characteristics of these defendants.”

Prosecutors in this case have bent over backwards to ensure shorter sentences for these two.

Good thing they’re not Trump supporters.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

I’m sure race had nothing to do with it. Just forget I even mentioned it. I’m ashamed of myself for even thinking it.

    Dennis in reply to Peabody. | June 4, 2022 at 10:24 am

    If they’d been young white lefties I expect they would have been treated the same.

    CommoChief in reply to Peabody. | June 4, 2022 at 10:26 am

    In this instance their ideology was likely the determining factor. Create and carry incendiary devices then use them to torch a police vehicle, distribute other devices while urging people to take them up and use those devices v other targets of opportunity….

    That was all done for reasons of ‘social justice’ so their heart was in the right place even if their methods were flawed. Contrast to Jan 6 protests where the methods were fairly benign but the ideology was ‘wrong think’ and we arrive at the heart of the matter. Some pigs ARE more equal than others. Orwell wrote to warn us but the left uses it as an instruction manual.

      Dennis in reply to CommoChief. | June 4, 2022 at 11:13 am

      I don’t think they succeeded in torching any police vehicles, apparently Molatov Cocktail making isn’t taught in law school. Anyway, I agree, it was a Democrat administration going easy on lefty radicals.

        txvet2 in reply to Dennis. | June 4, 2022 at 2:36 pm

        “”two New York lawyers were captured on security footage firebombing an unoccupied NYPD cruiser “”

        I seem to remember seeing the pictures at the time.

        Mick Gold Coast QLD in reply to Dennis. | June 6, 2022 at 8:41 am

        Nice try Dennis. Just like txvet2 below I recall the footage. Have a look at the hobos – these are your representatives, unelected but unopposed, who agree with the policy for the future of the USA, for the destruction of your country. They will be bribed out of gaol well before time, to rejoin the implementation phase.

    henrybowman in reply to Peabody. | June 4, 2022 at 4:57 pm

    “expressed regret, but fought federal prosecutors’ effort to brand them as terrorists”
    In a notarized affidavit to the court, the two successfully argued, “We not white.”

stevewhitemd | June 4, 2022 at 10:16 am

The real lesson for young, radical lawyers? Don’t throw Molotov cocktails, go work for Perkins Coie. That’s where you can really wreck the system.

So long as they never practice law again, I’m fine with the sentences.

    Subotai Bahadur in reply to Dennis. | June 4, 2022 at 12:40 pm

    You can bet that they will end up being pardoned and will be practicing law or working for the government. This is just the first step to seeing them publicly rewarded to incentivize their fellow Marxists.

    Subotai Bahadur

    Peabody in reply to Dennis. | June 4, 2022 at 1:51 pm

    “So long as they never practice law again…”

    They thought they were practicing law when they threw those cocktails at the police cars.

    txvet2 in reply to Dennis. | June 4, 2022 at 2:37 pm

    Odds are their licenses will be quietly reinstated somewhere down the line.

They still have a bright future in the Democrat Party. Their resume is stellar.

E Howard Hunt | June 4, 2022 at 10:31 am

I understand that two mitigating factors were that the cocktails used clean diesel and were in returnable bottles.

They dodged a bullet, but let’s wait and see what Karma does to them!

It’s good to be black and radical

Not so much to be white and conservative

Just ask Jan 6 victims, and I mean those imprisoned

texansamurai | June 4, 2022 at 12:01 pm

shame the molotov didn’t ignite and give them both a proper roasting

Can’t Cornell find a couple of tenured spots for these devoted Marxists?

    paracelsus in reply to Q. | June 4, 2022 at 2:10 pm

    Aw, c’mon. There’s still hope fer “The Big Red”.
    Hahvad, OTOH? Weel, they’ve still gotta learn to speak English.

They will feel like chumps for admitted anything, Leftists don’t go to jail silly.

“personal characteristics”?

Maybe they got a light sentence because they were fine upstanding citizens with a well developed moral compass and a history of kindness and empathy for others Or maybe not.

Welcome to the U. S. version of the banana republic legal system.

Nice to see everyone agrees on the facts. I wish there was more we could do to change the DOJ and the courts. They are on the wrong path.

Hopefully, these idiots will never be able to practice.

So who judges the judges? Because someone needs to ask some questions of this one.

“On October 20, 2021, Judge Brian Cogan held a hearing during which he accepted the defendants’ guilty plea to count 7 of the indictment (possessing and making an explosive device).

The court’s acceptance of the guilty plea invokes Rule 11(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 11(d) provides that a defendant is permitted to withdraw a guilty plea after the court accepts it and before sentencing only if “the defendant can show a fair and just reason for requesting the withdrawal.”

In the case of Mattis and Rahman, however, the prosecutors agreed to reduce the charges to one count of conspiracy and to recommend a vastly reduced sentence. No showing of cause for the withdrawal of defendants’ guilty plea was offered or made.”

So are the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure just suggestions now?

Steven Brizel | June 10, 2022 at 4:41 pm

Don’t bet on either of these two lawyers and would be terrorists , who were aided by the woke NY legal creme de la creme of former federal prosecutors in staying out on bail ever serving a day in jail or being disbarred for their conduct. Compare this to Giuliani who was suspended because of his comments re the 2020 election and inconsistent statements in court