Image 01 Image 03

Tulsi Gabbard and Mitt Romney get into nasty spat over US funded biolabs in Ukraine

Tulsi Gabbard and Mitt Romney get into nasty spat over US funded biolabs in Ukraine

Romney called Gabbard a traitor and Gabbard insisted Romney resign.

Grandstanding, calculated dispute, whatever it is, Tulsi Gabbard and Sen. Mitt Romney got into a nasty Twitter spat after Gabbard published a video encouraging all involved forces to destroy “dangerous pathogens” housed in the US-funded biolabs in Ukraine. Romney called Gabbard a traitor and Gabbard insisted Romney resign.

The video:

Sen. Romney to accused Gabbard of spreading “treasonous lies.”

To which Gabbard responded:



Also relevant:



Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Tulsi did no more than tell the truth.

They are both trash.

    Peabody in reply to Dathurtz. | March 14, 2022 at 3:26 pm

    One needs to be recycled.
    And one needs to go to the landfill.

    Dathurtz in reply to Dathurtz. | March 14, 2022 at 6:24 pm

    Do we have that many people supporting Tulsi here? Wow.

    Can anybody explain to me how they can support either of those two individuals?

      henrybowman in reply to Dathurtz. | March 14, 2022 at 9:36 pm

      Tulsi is like Bill Maher: basically faulty worldview, but amazingly based on specific issues at specific times.

      Romney is like Biden.

      4rdm2 in reply to Dathurtz. | March 15, 2022 at 5:32 am

      Because in this case she is right and he is wrong?

        Dathurtz in reply to 4rdm2. | March 15, 2022 at 2:18 pm

        Being right here doesn’t make her good or even acceptable. Are people really so dull that they are willing to support somebody just because they torch somebody else that they hate more? It is possible for two people in a disagreement to suck. One of them might even be right. Such is the case here.

      taurus the judge in reply to Dathurtz. | March 15, 2022 at 12:54 pm

      In all fairness, acknowledging she is correct on a single point issue is a long way from “supporting” her.

        I agree what she says here is absolutely right. That doesn’t make her any good at all. I don’t get the mindset that goes “Oh, this person said something I like, they must be great!” She has a long record of trash positions that would destroy the fabric and nature of our country and people here are doing a big seal-slap for her.

      I do not support Tulsi’s politics in general (she is a liberal Democrat), but it is a sad state of affairs when a Democrat is more in the right than a so called Republican Mittens Romney. Romney is a putrid pandering pile of red panda poop.

    Tulsi – like Manchin – are the best of the worst.

Tulsi is right on the actual substance even ignoring everything else.

We really need to tighten our laws. Our research should be at facilities the long arm of the law can inspect and reach without restriction (i.e. on American soil).

    Martin in reply to Danny. | March 14, 2022 at 5:06 pm

    But that is exactly why they are not here.

    stevewhitemd in reply to Danny. | March 14, 2022 at 5:31 pm

    Consider that our NIAID (Fauci, etc.) had contracts with the biolabs in Wuhan (Wuhan Institute of Virology). Now we hear that we had contracts with biolabs in the Ukraine.

    An obvious question — where ELSE do we have contracts?

    I wouldn’t put it past our Deep State to have contracts with Russian biolabs, for example.

    JohnSmith100 in reply to Danny. | March 14, 2022 at 8:48 pm

    I is a huge mistake to build intellectual capacity in other countries, much better to do that here.

      henrybowman in reply to JohnSmith100. | March 14, 2022 at 9:48 pm

      Except it is illegal to do that research here.
      So instead, they have to do it somewhere else.
      And to make sure they continue to control its fruits,
      they have to make sure they control that somewhere else.
      That was the whole point of the 2014 (Obama) Maidan coup.
      The pieces fit together nicely, if you know what to look for.

I knew when I voted for Romney and Ryan I might regret it. Never figured they both would be such colossally corrupt.

Tulsi, a principled alternative, a viable Democrat candidate? There are precedents, even a super precedent, to lead our once “shining city upon the hill”.

    AnAdultInDiapers in reply to n.n. | March 14, 2022 at 7:54 pm

    I dislike her politics and she’s done the odd thing that reeks but she’s got more integrity than most politicians, let alone American politicians.

      henrybowman in reply to AnAdultInDiapers. | March 14, 2022 at 10:11 pm

      I get the feeling she is sincere, even when she’s sincerely wrong. She’s doing what she has deduced is right, not pandering to a pressure group like a Cori Bush or a Lori Lightfoot. I get the same feeling from Russell Means, and the pills he has been handing out most recently have progressed from deep blue to quite fluorescently violet.

    diver64 in reply to n.n. | March 15, 2022 at 4:48 am

    I think so. I disagree with almost all of her positions on the issues but she is principled as far as I can say and a serious person who has thought out what she believes. A far cry from what the Dems have in charge now. Never forget how she took Harris apart on the debate stage.

There might also be a Biochem lab in Wuhan, China that the US funded that we should look into. Oops! It is not Where’s Waldo these days, but Where’s Fauci.

Not a big fan of Gabbard but Romney is the only one who got nasty here.

Gabbard’s measured response has apparently silenced Willard.

I’m wondering if the over-the-top, borderline unhinged outrage from Mittens is a sign of early stage Alzheimer’s.

AF_Chief_Master_Sgt | March 14, 2022 at 4:58 pm

I never thought there would be a day that I agreed with Tulsi Gabbard. But Romney sure does make that an easy decision.

A hard core Democrat, and a White Obama. Hmmmmmm, who does one choose?

The Washington established sure did have a problem with the ‘norm-destroying’ Donald Trump and his churlish, Bull in a China Shop disposition and his propensity for calling political opponent inappropriate names . And yet, here we have a sitting US Senator calling a former House member a TRAITOR – in public, no less – merely raised the notion that we should be more circumspect when dealing with a nuclear superpower. If that’s not ‘norm-destroying,’ what is?

I don’t agree with most things Gabbard says. But, some things she says have some merit. If Mitt Romney can’t make a logical, compelling counter-argument with first offering an ad hominem attack, then maybe he can’t make a logical, compelling counter-argument.

    AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to TargaGTS. | March 15, 2022 at 8:36 am

    Romney couldn’t make a compelling counter argument to Candy Crowley when she emasculated him with a lie during a debate with Obama.

This is the same Romney who lost a presidential debate to Candy Crowley. That is why I have voted 3rd party so many times. The squishy GOP keeps forcing me to cite the Pasadena Phil Rule.

Still waiting to hear more about the lab we funded in Wuhan.

Did Fauci go into hiding before more of his experiments get released?

AnAdultInDiapers | March 14, 2022 at 7:58 pm

Article cites #6 twice.

I think she’s insane for citing #5, the source means I instinctively believe the opposite.

But she’s provided references, and even without that I really can’t see what she’s said that might be considered treasonous, or indeed that parrots Russian propaganda. The Russians are claiming there are biological weapons programmes, and Gabbard hasn’t mentioned weapons at all.

With luck both of them will go away. tulsi may be temporarily red pilled but she’s a liberal to the core.

Ok, OK, “UNCLE”.

Anyone, even a lefty, that puts that corrupt commie Romney in his place gets my admiration. I’ve resisted as long as I can.

I like Tulsi even if I disagree with her most of the time but she is right on this one. It has been known since the fall of the Soviet Union that along with their nukes, Ukraine had these labs. The US has been funding them ever since in order to keep them safe and figure out how to shut them down. For Romney to call her “traitorous” is silly. I loathe the man but he is usually smarter than this.

healthguyfsu | March 15, 2022 at 7:23 am

Take him out then go away…that’s my most useful position for Gabbard.

I sure hope Utah voters smarten up and don’t send the useless Romney back to DC. The guy is a complete idiot.

    JohnSmith100 in reply to Photoman42. | March 15, 2022 at 11:43 am

    Nearly as Omar, AOC, Abrams, Waters and too many others.

    Barry in reply to Photoman42. | March 15, 2022 at 11:34 pm

    “Utah voters smarten up”

    I got a laugh out of that. Don’t hold your breath.

    henrybowman in reply to Photoman42. | March 16, 2022 at 10:26 am

    Having seen firsthand how a campaign machine like McCain’s can stymie the will of an entire state full of conservatives, plus survive well after his own death, I suspect the same thing may easily be going on in Utah.