Image 01 Image 03

Furman University Bans ‘Acts of Intolerance’

Furman University Bans ‘Acts of Intolerance’

“When an Act of Intolerance is targeted toward a specific person, it may rise to the level of discriminatory harassment.”

FIRE is highlighting this as its speech code of the month.

Campus Reform reports:

University BANS ‘acts of intolerance’

With Halloween approaching, college students may be thinking about what type of party they should host or what costume they should pick.

However, at Furman University, students might be restricted in their plans.

Free speech nonprofit the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) highlighted Furman’s “Acts of Intolerance” policy for its October speech code of the month.

The policy states that “an act of intolerance” can be defined “as any conduct that serves no scholarly purpose appropriate to the educational experience and demonstrates bias against others,” based on their sex, national origin, age, etc.

Under the policy, certain costumes and theme parties can “prompt additional investigation” and are discouraged by the school.

“Theme parties that encourage people to wear costumes or act in ways that reinforce stereotypes or are otherwise demeaning,” the policy lists as one item that can lead to “additional investigation.”

Additionally, “culturally offensive gestures,” vandalism, and the use of slurs can all be considered “Acts of Intolerance.”

“When an Act of Intolerance is targeted toward a specific person, it may rise to the level of discriminatory harassment. It may also constitute a hate crime for the purposes of local, state, or federal law,” the policy states.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Because speech = violence and disagreement = racism.

To “Ban intolerance” seems to logically parallel “Kill extremists.”

Will a Jussie Smollett costume be banned?

But the problem is how many of the students (or the professors) know about the Intolerable Acts?

https://www.thoughtco.com/the-intolerable-acts-2361386

Antifundamentalist | October 20, 2019 at 5:24 pm

The entire policy is an “act of intolerance” according to its own definition.

I think every white male on campus should go out dressed as the US President of their choice.