Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act heads to Obama’s Desk (#JVTA)

Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act heads to Obama’s Desk (#JVTA)

Sign it.

Today, the House of Representatives voted 420-3 to approve the Justice For Victims of Trafficking Act, a piece of legislation that stands to put a major dent in the big business of modern day slavery.

Last we heard of the JVTA, it had just escaped partisan gridlock in the Senate over abortion funding language Democrats argued would lead to an expansion of the Hyde Amendment. Republicans, however, reworded the language of the bill, kept federal funds away from abortion clinics, and forced Harry Reid’s hand on the issue. The bill passed out of the Senate, and made its way to the House where it passed easily.

Now, it’s finally heading for the President’s desk.

For all the posturing from Democrats that held up passage of the bill for so long, today’s vote was remarkably…unremarkable:

The 420-3 vote happened with little fanfare or debate, a quiet finale for a bill that provoked weeks of partisan dissent in the Senate and held up the confirmation of Loretta Lynch as attorney general.

The dispute in the Senate focused on whether money in the new fund could be spent to pay for abortions. In the end senators resolved it by structuring the fund to reassure Republicans that abortion funding restrictions were being followed – and Democrats that they were not being expanded.

The House went along, approving the bill as it had passed the Senate.

“Drugs are only sold once, but minor children can be, and are, prostituted multiple times a day, every day,” House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., said on the floor late Monday ahead of the vote. “It is time for Congress to send a clear message that we won’t stand for this.”

This is a fantastic development; Obama should sign it immediately so law enforcement officials can get to work putting slavers and sex traffickers out of business.

The only problem? How is it that we took so long to get to this point?

A similar version of this bill went nowhere last Congressional session. When the modern iteration of the JVTA made its way back to the Senate floor, Democrats used it as an excuse to posture on abortion, knowing full well that 1) Hyde wouldn’t be expanded by the original language of the bill, and 2) actually blocking bipartisan legislation aimed at protecting victims of sexual and human rights abuses would be political suicide.

The bottom line is that Democrats postured at the expense of the exploited, gained no ground, and now have earned a legacy of having their hands forced when it came to abolishing modern day slavery.

I just hope Obama knows better than to test the waters with this one.

Congratulations to the GOP—this was a hard-fought battle and a well-earned victory!

You can read our coverage of the JVTA fight here.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Tags:

Comments

Humphrey's Executor | May 19, 2015 at 5:06 pm

Does this law amend/update the Mann Act?

“The bottom line is that Democrats postured at the expense of the exploited, gained no ground, and now have earned a legacy of having their hands forced when it came to abolishing modern day slavery.”

Oh, Boy! A new law was passed! That’ll fix everything!

Sigh.

Trust me, little one, “slavery” was already, like, way, WAY illegal. Democrats aren’t the only politicians who posture.

Does anyone know about these two treaties? The TPP and TTIP.
The media has not given it much attention.

Yippie!!!

Now the new magic phrase to get amnesty & fed bennies is “They made me have sex for money.”

It embiggens Big Government and enriches and adds power to the Police State. Of course Obama will sign it.

I’ll add that I find it disappointing that unless I missed it, this blog, a law blog, never did a real, impartial, law-based analysis of what this new legislation would do, what it would cost (both in terms of money/resources and in terms of liberty), what practical and real-life effects it would have both federally and locally, and why it was that none our of our existing legislation could handle any of the problems it proposes to “solve”.

Blind, fact-free cheerleading can be had at any number of blogs.

    Anonamom in reply to Amy in FL. | May 19, 2015 at 6:28 pm

    “…a law blog, never did a real, impartial, law-based analysis of what this new legislation would do, what it would cost (both in terms of money/resources and in terms of liberty), what practical and real-life effects it would have both federally and locally, and why it was that none our of our existing legislation could handle any of the problems it proposes to “solve”.

    But, but, but the “optics” are so great; why would we need to do any “analysis?” Besides, that sounds, ya know,like, hard and stuff.

“Drugs are only sold once, but minor children can be, and are, prostituted multiple times a day, every day … It is time for Congress to send a clear message that we won’t stand for this.”

So, what’s the clear message? The only clear message here is that once again posturing over minutiae of abortion funding policy paralyses the legislature … but only for a while; just long enough for everyone to pretend they’re working on Big Things Which Really Need To Be Done and which, ahhh, well, apparently have something peripheral to do with abortion funding policy. And when the smoke clears, the Repubs can say they put on a show about, errr, well, you know, abortion funding policy, and the Dems can say that they got what they wanted—Eric Holder Lite as Attorney General.

Yes, we definitely need more victories like that.

Midwest Rhino | May 19, 2015 at 6:25 pm

I don’t know what this law does beyond what was already illegal. But the Dem modus operandi as I see it, is if something is good for America, they will bargain with Republicans over it.

“You want what’s good for da people, you gotta give us a little sumpthin for our commie agenda”

Put that in mob boss slang, and you get the message, capeesh?

Henry Hawkins | May 19, 2015 at 9:12 pm

Ouch, lol.

buckeyeminuteman | May 20, 2015 at 1:35 pm

That which was already illegal is now again…illegal. And we got Loretta Lynch in the process.

Obama – Win
America – Lose
Modern Day Slaves – Tie

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend