Psst, Hillary operatives
I have been telling you for at least a year that Elizabeth Warren will be a serious challenger to Hillary, if she wants it.
You have to realize that Democrats in general, and particularly the liberal base, don’t give a hoot about Warren’s rip-off of Cherokee identity to juice her resume as she climbed towards Harvard Law School.
Hell, they still lionize Ted Kennedy. And Bubba. ‘Nuff said.
This cover from The New Republic (article not live until Sunday) is just a reflection of the building momentum.
And I agree with them, Warren is Hillary’s worst nightmare.
If Warren wants to be.
Excuse me if I don’t have time to write much more, I have to start updating ElizabethWarrenWiki.org.
So Hillary operatives. Psst. Wanna help?
I bet you’ve dragged some $100 bills through Oklahoma already.
And those Harvard Law hiring files they won’t release, hah, that’s like stealing candy from a baby for you.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Does the left have anyone in line for the Presidency who won’t be eligible to collect Social Security in 2016? Their fresh new face Warren is pretty long in the tooth.
Allow me to interpret so that the Harvard faculty can understand your comment.
Her say Liawatha see many moons. Soon come trip to happy hunting ground.
D a r n ! That Warren Man sure is as pasty white as they come.
Man what an ugly dude!
Why oh why does Warren’s pics always make me wonder about the difference between a sociopath and a psychopath?
We found this great photo of Miss Lizzy as she was leaving Oklahoma for the big, wide world of opportunity open to a smart, blond/blue Cherokee maiden. Being a white Indian says, “Me have’um cake and eat’um cake, too.”
I’m offended by this woman all the way down to the genetic level, where my Cherokee, Choctaw and Sac and Fox genes cry out, “Ass-hat!”
1. Does the left have anyone in line for the Presidency who won’t be eligible to collect Social Security in 2016?
The 1960s Tantrum Boomers will be as narcissistic leaving the stage as they were entering it.
2. Their fresh new face Warren is pretty long in the tooth.
That image was chosen deliberately. Her age would show even more were her features not in repose. However, her “neutral” expression signals that she is an unpleasant individual, which is no secret to LI readers. I would think that someone so unlikable has no chance at the Presidency, but a) I don’t have a feel for this country anymore, and b) no doubt the Republicans can nominate someone worse.
Hillary, otoh, is not trying to hide her age. Probably the best move under the circumstances. (Is she trying to evoke Angela Merkel?)
3. The New Republic piece purports to be revelatory but, of course, isn’t in the least. All that Hollywood money wasn’t dumped on Warren just to get a Senate seat.
78 is the new 13 don’t you know!
That is one of the scariest pictures I’ve ever seen!
I’m just thinking aloud here… How bad do things need to get before they get better?
Could Warren be more left than Obama?
Give the Native American Woman a chance to…
How bad did they have to get in Germany before they got better?
Could Warren be even more incompetent than Obama?
You mean a “Wise(n) old Faux” one?
With Warren, we would be double punching out the affirmative action ‘thing’ with one ticket.
To get that thing out of the way, out of our system, it’s better if it’s done in succession, one after the other, so that the memory of the screw ups stay fresh in the fleeting consciousness of America for a generation or two.
‘That thing’ being the idea that the best way to get rid of something is to reward it.
You can’t be serious! Another four years of liberals destroying the country?
Oh, hell…why not. There isn’t much left anyway.
It’s not so much that the Democrat’s bench has no depth as it is they’re having to recruit out of the bleachers.
and from Under the Bleachers!!!!
Get an edit function.
Why, why, why? What has elevated her to Presidential material?
I REALLY don’t understand her appeal.
She has no “material” and that is her appeal to the leftist.
Remember Obama is a complete non-professional No-Body. He had no political history and his handlers made sure he voted “Present” just about 100% of the time before he became the Present of the U.S.
Choosing between Hillary and Warren is like choosing between Benghazi Nurse Ratched and Fake Indian Nurse Ratched. Hard core progressives might like that choice, but I’m not sure anyone else will.
For pure CREEPY, that picture rivals this one…
What is it about the Collective that impels them to make our flesh crawl…???
“Democrats realize…their soul lies…..”
Just substitute another meaning for the word “lie” (not the body position) and you see the True Meaning.
The only difference between Hillary and Warren is just how far left a Democrat voter wants to go. Otherwise, either one gives the party all it needs in the newest tactic to “influence” voters and “change minds.” While for the last 5 years anyone who disagrees or opposes almost any leftist ideology is labeled “racist”, now the progressives will get a chance to refresh with “misogynistic”….or, hey, maybe even “imperialists” if Warren is the target of any opposing view. After all, the white man has been ruling over the native population for centuries, right?? Those evil founders and their horrible ways…..
Blog noir. Elizabeth Warren brings out the Raymond Chandler in Professor Jacobson.
The cloning of “Pseudo-Cherokees” is now upon us.
And remember Professor, “you didn’t build this” blog. Gov’t allowed you to build it via highways and programs and Liz Warren’s Tea Parties.
This is also America’s nightmare.
Is it an army of Julias on the cover?