<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can we get back to &#8220;you didn&#8217;t build that&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 04:27:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey, Remember When Obama Said &#8216;You Didn&#8217;t Build That&#8217; &#124; The Lonely Conservative</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hey, Remember When Obama Said &#8216;You Didn&#8217;t Build That&#8217; &#124; The Lonely Conservative]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that&#8221; comment. So here&#8217;s a fun little reminded that he said it, from Politizoid via Legal Insurrection. He said it, he meant it, and he owns it.google_ad_client = &quot;ca-pub-1395656889568144&quot;; /* 300x250, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] that&#8221; comment. So here&#8217;s a fun little reminded that he said it, from Politizoid via Legal Insurrection. He said it, he meant it, and he owns it.google_ad_client = &quot;ca-pub-1395656889568144&quot;; /* 300&#215;250, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll have an earful to say whether Romney wins or whether he loses. In the meantime, I try to stick to what I posted &lt;a href=&quot;http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/04/pulling-romney-across-the-finish-line/comment-page-1/#comment-335216&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;five months ago&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;Before we can complain what a RINO douchebag President Romney is, we have to get him elected. Since I prefer the rotting carcass of a syphilitic camel to Obama, you bet I prefer a RINO with a business background.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have an earful to say whether Romney wins or whether he loses. In the meantime, I try to stick to what I posted <a href="http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/04/pulling-romney-across-the-finish-line/comment-page-1/#comment-335216" rel="nofollow">five months ago</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Before we can complain what a RINO douchebag President Romney is, we have to get him elected. Since I prefer the rotting carcass of a syphilitic camel to Obama, you bet I prefer a RINO with a business background.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 05:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. &lt;i&gt;It seems you don’t understand the concept of free speech.&lt;/i&gt;

Some people assert a right to free speech where no such right exists.

2. &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;I like Professor Jacobson&lt;/b&gt;, he has done stellar work in regard to Elizabeth Warren.&lt;/i&gt; 

Really.---&lt;blockquote&gt;Sadly this site is one of the worst offenders. The pundits who wanted different candidates just can’t seem to get over the fact their guy lost. They would rather be “right” about Romney being “the wrong guy” than getting rid of Barack Obama.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. <i>It seems you don’t understand the concept of free speech.</i></p>
<p>Some people assert a right to free speech where no such right exists.</p>
<p>2. <i><b>I like Professor Jacobson</b>, he has done stellar work in regard to Elizabeth Warren.</i> </p>
<p>Really.&#8212;<br />
<blockquote>Sadly this site is one of the worst offenders. The pundits who wanted different candidates just can’t seem to get over the fact their guy lost. They would rather be “right” about Romney being “the wrong guy” than getting rid of Barack Obama.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalMark</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalMark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 05:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cowardice.  Effective campaign themes disappear because most Republicans are corrupt cowards.  

When a Republican anti-Obama strategy starts gaining traction, the media immediately denounces it.  The GOP&#039;s old ladies/insiders/soulless consultants panic about the effects on their own personal position in the political graft hierarchy.  Through pressure and unconscionable public attacks (Bill Kristol, call your office), they try to smash the effective strategy and intimidate the weaker kind of Republican into abandoning it.

Romney is the weaker kind of Republican.  Like John McCain, he is very brave when it comes to ambush fratricide; in real warfare, Romney is timid, fearful, an feckless.  He is running a moderately-improved version of McCain&#039;s.

Some immutable truths:
Democrats are the political graft-meisters.
Republicans want their share of graft.
Getting that share means staying on Democrats&#039; good side.
Staying on Democrats&#039; good side means demolishing any strategy the Democrats hate.
Democrats hate anything that is effective against Obama.
Therefore, corrupt, cowardly Republicans would rather see Obama re-elected than offend Democrats and harm their own chances for corruption money.
(If that weren&#039;t true, Boehner -- who is playing the damn fool old lady catastrophizer Rush Limbaugh like a fiddle -- and the rest of his turncoat dinosaurs would be fighting Obamacare funding and the deficit tooth and nail instead of enabling it.)

Situation: a President inherits a bad economy, then injects socialism and proceeds to make it a whole lot worse. He tramples the Constitution, demonizes the producers, and attempts to suppress dissent.  Widespread grass-roots organizations arise to counter him, but become ineffective due to an absence of visionary leadership.  I&#039;m describing FDR.  

If Romney doesn&#039;t get his act together, he&#039;ll go down in history with Wendell Wilkie, Bob Dole, and John McCain.  And it&#039;s entirely possible that Obama will be the Democrats&#039; dreamed-for re-incarnation of FDR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cowardice.  Effective campaign themes disappear because most Republicans are corrupt cowards.  </p>
<p>When a Republican anti-Obama strategy starts gaining traction, the media immediately denounces it.  The GOP&#8217;s old ladies/insiders/soulless consultants panic about the effects on their own personal position in the political graft hierarchy.  Through pressure and unconscionable public attacks (Bill Kristol, call your office), they try to smash the effective strategy and intimidate the weaker kind of Republican into abandoning it.</p>
<p>Romney is the weaker kind of Republican.  Like John McCain, he is very brave when it comes to ambush fratricide; in real warfare, Romney is timid, fearful, an feckless.  He is running a moderately-improved version of McCain&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Some immutable truths:<br />
Democrats are the political graft-meisters.<br />
Republicans want their share of graft.<br />
Getting that share means staying on Democrats&#8217; good side.<br />
Staying on Democrats&#8217; good side means demolishing any strategy the Democrats hate.<br />
Democrats hate anything that is effective against Obama.<br />
Therefore, corrupt, cowardly Republicans would rather see Obama re-elected than offend Democrats and harm their own chances for corruption money.<br />
(If that weren&#8217;t true, Boehner &#8212; who is playing the damn fool old lady catastrophizer Rush Limbaugh like a fiddle &#8212; and the rest of his turncoat dinosaurs would be fighting Obamacare funding and the deficit tooth and nail instead of enabling it.)</p>
<p>Situation: a President inherits a bad economy, then injects socialism and proceeds to make it a whole lot worse. He tramples the Constitution, demonizes the producers, and attempts to suppress dissent.  Widespread grass-roots organizations arise to counter him, but become ineffective due to an absence of visionary leadership.  I&#8217;m describing FDR.  </p>
<p>If Romney doesn&#8217;t get his act together, he&#8217;ll go down in history with Wendell Wilkie, Bob Dole, and John McCain.  And it&#8217;s entirely possible that Obama will be the Democrats&#8217; dreamed-for re-incarnation of FDR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: counsel4pay</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[counsel4pay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 04:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“THE DEM RATS DIDN’T BUILD THEIR EVIL PLAN ON THEIR OWN”

[It was Satan’s work…indeed.  This piece of whimsy is dedicated to the  IMPS, PIMPS AND WIMPS AT [OUR] WHITE HOUSE—yeah, we’re taking it back.]

The Dem Rats plan’s not subtle, 
“They didn’t built it on their own” 
They took “dictation” from the Father of Lies, 
While bowing before his throne!
He’d promised them outrageous things!
If they’d do as he asked,
And we, the people, he hates most, 
Drank his Kool-Aid really fast.  

Well “four years later”, and damn their souls-- 
We learned the Dem-Rats are thieves.
So those “minions” who corrupt our house, 
Will soon be asked to leave, 
The old “choom*” magic’s dead now, 
And we’ll no longer be deceived. 
And though “THE WON”’s had a lot of fun, 
He and his better start to grieve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“THE DEM RATS DIDN’T BUILD THEIR EVIL PLAN ON THEIR OWN”</p>
<p>[It was Satan’s work…indeed.  This piece of whimsy is dedicated to the  IMPS, PIMPS AND WIMPS AT [OUR] WHITE HOUSE—yeah, we’re taking it back.]</p>
<p>The Dem Rats plan’s not subtle,<br />
“They didn’t built it on their own”<br />
They took “dictation” from the Father of Lies,<br />
While bowing before his throne!<br />
He’d promised them outrageous things!<br />
If they’d do as he asked,<br />
And we, the people, he hates most,<br />
Drank his Kool-Aid really fast.  </p>
<p>Well “four years later”, and damn their souls&#8211;<br />
We learned the Dem-Rats are thieves.<br />
So those “minions” who corrupt our house,<br />
Will soon be asked to leave,<br />
The old “choom*” magic’s dead now,<br />
And we’ll no longer be deceived.<br />
And though “THE WON”’s had a lot of fun,<br />
He and his better start to grieve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRoyalll</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KRoyalll]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 03:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think anyone cares what you would tolerate. It seems you don&#039;t understand the concept of free speech. I like Professor Jacobson, he has done stellar work in regard to Elizabeth Warren. I just don&#039;t see what we would allow the MSM to set our agenda. Romney hasn&#039;t done anything radically wrong, it is Obama who is the failure, not Mitt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone cares what you would tolerate. It seems you don&#8217;t understand the concept of free speech. I like Professor Jacobson, he has done stellar work in regard to Elizabeth Warren. I just don&#8217;t see what we would allow the MSM to set our agenda. Romney hasn&#8217;t done anything radically wrong, it is Obama who is the failure, not Mitt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 01:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his position I would not tolerate your manner of commenting, but your status at LI is up to the site&#039;s proprietor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his position I would not tolerate your manner of commenting, but your status at LI is up to the site&#8217;s proprietor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRoyalll</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KRoyalll]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just because I don&#039;t comment much doesn&#039;t mean I don&#039;t monitor this site. I do, almost every day. But let me get this straight, it is fine and dandy to criticize Romney constantly but heaven forbid anyone should comment on a blogger? In fact I should be BANNED because I dared to speak my mind? You belong in the other party.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because I don&#8217;t comment much doesn&#8217;t mean I don&#8217;t monitor this site. I do, almost every day. But let me get this straight, it is fine and dandy to criticize Romney constantly but heaven forbid anyone should comment on a blogger? In fact I should be BANNED because I dared to speak my mind? You belong in the other party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. I find nothing to fault about how our host switched his support to Romney after his preferred candidate dropped out of the primaries. His mindfulness of the big picture sets an example for me.

2. Bill is far more patient and tolerant than I am. 

If I were he and somebody, who had &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.google.com/search?q=KRoyalll+site%3Alegalinsurrection.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;apparently&lt;/a&gt; posted at LI only once before, showed up with a truculent canard like &lt;i&gt; Sadly this site is one of the worst offenders,&lt;/i&gt; that would be the last truculent canard which that individual made here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. I find nothing to fault about how our host switched his support to Romney after his preferred candidate dropped out of the primaries. His mindfulness of the big picture sets an example for me.</p>
<p>2. Bill is far more patient and tolerant than I am. </p>
<p>If I were he and somebody, who had <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=KRoyalll+site%3Alegalinsurrection.com" rel="nofollow">apparently</a> posted at LI only once before, showed up with a truculent canard like <i> Sadly this site is one of the worst offenders,</i> that would be the last truculent canard which that individual made here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRoyalll</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KRoyalll]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobody pushed &quot;you didn&#039;t build that&quot; more than Romney. You want to know what happened to it? The MSM started a narrative that Mitt was committing gaffes and the dumb ass so-called &quot;Conservative&quot; media rushed to agree with them. Sadly this site is one of the worst offenders. The pundits who wanted different candidates just can&#039;t seem to get over the fact their guy lost. They would rather be &quot;right&quot; about Romney being &quot;the wrong guy&quot; than getting rid of Barack Obama. Obama has given us enough material to last 1000 years, we don&#039;t need to spend time flogging our own candidates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody pushed &#8220;you didn&#8217;t build that&#8221; more than Romney. You want to know what happened to it? The MSM started a narrative that Mitt was committing gaffes and the dumb ass so-called &#8220;Conservative&#8221; media rushed to agree with them. Sadly this site is one of the worst offenders. The pundits who wanted different candidates just can&#8217;t seem to get over the fact their guy lost. They would rather be &#8220;right&#8221; about Romney being &#8220;the wrong guy&#8221; than getting rid of Barack Obama. Obama has given us enough material to last 1000 years, we don&#8217;t need to spend time flogging our own candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midwest Rhino</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Midwest Rhino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[related ... Obama never builds anything.  He seems to be anti-American on everything, and pro global redistribution of wealth and power.  He doesn&#039;t even build a campaign on himself, he raises himself by destroying his competitors.  Four years ago he won on hope and hate ... still has not built.  He only breaks things.

He wants to break private insurance, using &quot;public option&quot; as a &quot;trojan horse&quot; to his desired &quot;single payer&quot;.  All should be equal ... you wait behind the illegal alien for a transplant as Obama&#039;s punishment for being a capitalist.

He wants green energy to emerge, by skyrocketing the cost of other energy, shutting down the gulf and pipelines, with EPA over regulation by fiat.

He wants other world powers to emerge, by harming our relationships with old allies, but bending to old enemies.  (Israel, Poland, Russia, Egypt, Libya)

He encouraged Zelaya&#039;s breaking of Democracy, siding with Chavez and Castro.  Here he rules by fiat, breaking our balance of power, rather than building bipartisanship.

He is breaking our strong dollar by skyrocketing our debt and open ended quantitative easing, leading to fiscal collapse.

Obama is a wrecking ball ... he hates the builder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>related &#8230; Obama never builds anything.  He seems to be anti-American on everything, and pro global redistribution of wealth and power.  He doesn&#8217;t even build a campaign on himself, he raises himself by destroying his competitors.  Four years ago he won on hope and hate &#8230; still has not built.  He only breaks things.</p>
<p>He wants to break private insurance, using &#8220;public option&#8221; as a &#8220;trojan horse&#8221; to his desired &#8220;single payer&#8221;.  All should be equal &#8230; you wait behind the illegal alien for a transplant as Obama&#8217;s punishment for being a capitalist.</p>
<p>He wants green energy to emerge, by skyrocketing the cost of other energy, shutting down the gulf and pipelines, with EPA over regulation by fiat.</p>
<p>He wants other world powers to emerge, by harming our relationships with old allies, but bending to old enemies.  (Israel, Poland, Russia, Egypt, Libya)</p>
<p>He encouraged Zelaya&#8217;s breaking of Democracy, siding with Chavez and Castro.  Here he rules by fiat, breaking our balance of power, rather than building bipartisanship.</p>
<p>He is breaking our strong dollar by skyrocketing our debt and open ended quantitative easing, leading to fiscal collapse.</p>
<p>Obama is a wrecking ball &#8230; he hates the builder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoldenAh</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GoldenAh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know if it was Romney&#039;s campaign, or one of the Super PACs supporting him, but I found the &quot;Obama is not working&quot; theme to be the most powerful and persuasive. That should be done everywhere all the time. Each ad can be focused on each issue he&#039;s failed at. There&#039;s a wealth of material there.

People are miserable. The solutions the President offered are indeed &quot;not working.&quot; Those nails hammer in themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if it was Romney&#8217;s campaign, or one of the Super PACs supporting him, but I found the &#8220;Obama is not working&#8221; theme to be the most powerful and persuasive. That should be done everywhere all the time. Each ad can be focused on each issue he&#8217;s failed at. There&#8217;s a wealth of material there.</p>
<p>People are miserable. The solutions the President offered are indeed &#8220;not working.&#8221; Those nails hammer in themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midwest Rhino</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Midwest Rhino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;&lt;i&gt;it truly does speak to socialism. It reminds me of the days of the old ‘factory owners don’t make anything, factory workers make things’.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Yes ... but I think it is true, the owners (more generally) do NOT build it (the final product).  The citizen/worker needs to be recognized.  But the pool of citizens gets to make a private arrangement with the capitalist owner.  The risk taking capitalist has an idea and commits capital.  The workers agree privately, to work for money, gaining skills but providing no capital, taking no risk.  This arrangement means they are also capitalists, but not owners.

Obama says &quot;they think they are so smart, work so hard ... LET ME TELL YOU, there are a lot of smart hard working people out there.&quot;  He denigrates the capitalist arrangement.  The smartest and hardest working take risks and make their ideas work.  Capitalism rewards them more, while the capitalist workers also get rewarded BY THE OWNER.

But Obama says no, you take the risk, WE will take your excessive profits.  You are punished for taking risk, but if you lose your investment, too bad.

The capitalist team relationship is important.  It is a working relationship.  but Obama says NO, you owners are bad ... my unions will shut you down unless you give &quot;our workers&quot; what we unions demand.  Government has provided and trained those workers, your agreements will be determined by US.

Just pitting &quot;Yes I built that&quot;, against the Obama &quot;I care about the workers&quot; is not the right angle.  The right angle is that the owner worker relationship is private.  Paying union bosses to arm twist well paying capitalists only gives us more Detroits.  

Capitalists built this city ... Unions broke Detroit, and demanded taxpayer bailouts.

I&#039;m sure he could get Chicago well paid teachers that strike in there too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>it truly does speak to socialism. It reminds me of the days of the old ‘factory owners don’t make anything, factory workers make things’.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes &#8230; but I think it is true, the owners (more generally) do NOT build it (the final product).  The citizen/worker needs to be recognized.  But the pool of citizens gets to make a private arrangement with the capitalist owner.  The risk taking capitalist has an idea and commits capital.  The workers agree privately, to work for money, gaining skills but providing no capital, taking no risk.  This arrangement means they are also capitalists, but not owners.</p>
<p>Obama says &#8220;they think they are so smart, work so hard &#8230; LET ME TELL YOU, there are a lot of smart hard working people out there.&#8221;  He denigrates the capitalist arrangement.  The smartest and hardest working take risks and make their ideas work.  Capitalism rewards them more, while the capitalist workers also get rewarded BY THE OWNER.</p>
<p>But Obama says no, you take the risk, WE will take your excessive profits.  You are punished for taking risk, but if you lose your investment, too bad.</p>
<p>The capitalist team relationship is important.  It is a working relationship.  but Obama says NO, you owners are bad &#8230; my unions will shut you down unless you give &#8220;our workers&#8221; what we unions demand.  Government has provided and trained those workers, your agreements will be determined by US.</p>
<p>Just pitting &#8220;Yes I built that&#8221;, against the Obama &#8220;I care about the workers&#8221; is not the right angle.  The right angle is that the owner worker relationship is private.  Paying union bosses to arm twist well paying capitalists only gives us more Detroits.  </p>
<p>Capitalists built this city &#8230; Unions broke Detroit, and demanded taxpayer bailouts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure he could get Chicago well paid teachers that strike in there too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janitor</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[janitor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would also be useful I think for the Romney campaign to start hammering home the tax increases under Obamacare, e.g. the &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.realtor.org/small_business_health_coverage.nsf/docfiles/government_affairs_inves
t_inc_tax_broch.pdf/$FILE/government_affairs_invest_inc_tax_broch.pdf&quot;&gt;new 3.8% capital gains tax slated to go into effect in 2013&lt;/A&gt; -- including on middle class people and prospective retirees.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would also be useful I think for the Romney campaign to start hammering home the tax increases under Obamacare, e.g. the <a HREF="http://www.realtor.org/small_business_health_coverage.nsf/docfiles/government_affairs_inves<br />
t_inc_tax_broch.pdf/$FILE/government_affairs_invest_inc_tax_broch.pdf">new 3.8% capital gains tax slated to go into effect in 2013</a> &#8212; including on middle class people and prospective retirees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeoConScum</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoConScum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rags...You, Dude, are such a Wascally Wacist.(-:

Or, anyone is cordially invited to spend a decade or so familiarizing themselves with the massive, horrendous, ghastly, nearly unimaginable COST of Redistribution last century. 40-Million for the Soviet Union. 60-Million for the Peoples Republic of China. Shall I toss in the costs of Redistribution(cough,gasp,vomit..)in Cambodia, Vietnam, Romania, Cuba, Sandinista Nicaragua...?

That said, I LOVE this ad and urge the Mitt-Ryan Campaign to keep it and others like it OUT THERE, P*L*E*A*S*E!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rags&#8230;You, Dude, are such a Wascally Wacist.(-:</p>
<p>Or, anyone is cordially invited to spend a decade or so familiarizing themselves with the massive, horrendous, ghastly, nearly unimaginable COST of Redistribution last century. 40-Million for the Soviet Union. 60-Million for the Peoples Republic of China. Shall I toss in the costs of Redistribution(cough,gasp,vomit..)in Cambodia, Vietnam, Romania, Cuba, Sandinista Nicaragua&#8230;?</p>
<p>That said, I LOVE this ad and urge the Mitt-Ryan Campaign to keep it and others like it OUT THERE, P*L*E*A*S*E!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voyager</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Voyager]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m going to wander completely off the main topic of the thread just to say, that is such a funny ad!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to wander completely off the main topic of the thread just to say, that is such a funny ad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragspierre</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ragspierre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-panel-baffled-why-anyone-would-think-redistribution-of-wealth-is-bad/

Are these people confused...

OR are they working at CONFUSING?

&quot;Redistribution&quot; is really not a muddy term.  

But then, neither is &quot;property rights&quot;...or slavery.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-panel-baffled-why-anyone-would-think-redistribution-of-wealth-is-bad/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-panel-baffled-why-anyone-would-think-redistribution-of-wealth-is-bad/</a></p>
<p>Are these people confused&#8230;</p>
<p>OR are they working at CONFUSING?</p>
<p>&#8220;Redistribution&#8221; is really not a muddy term.  </p>
<p>But then, neither is &#8220;property rights&#8221;&#8230;or slavery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragspierre</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ragspierre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would do a couple of them in front of Ohio power plants about to be shut down.

JOBS--lost

POWER--lost

PRICES--&quot;necessarily skyrocket&quot;

THE GRID--pushed to failure]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would do a couple of them in front of Ohio power plants about to be shut down.</p>
<p>JOBS&#8211;lost</p>
<p>POWER&#8211;lost</p>
<p>PRICES&#8211;&#8220;necessarily skyrocket&#8221;</p>
<p>THE GRID&#8211;pushed to failure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betty</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[betty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Kristol of the Weekly Standard - I can never remember how to spell his name. 

And someone over on Breitbart had similar feelings.  http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/09/23/Back-off-Bill-Kristol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Kristol of the Weekly Standard &#8211; I can never remember how to spell his name. </p>
<p>And someone over on Breitbart had similar feelings.  <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/09/23/Back-off-Bill-Kristol" rel="nofollow">http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/09/23/Back-off-Bill-Kristol</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>https://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/can-we-get-back-to-you-didnt-build-that/comment-page-1/#comment-375090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=33105#comment-375090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. I agree that YDBT should not be forgotten, but it also should be expanded to include the majority of voters who are not entrepreneurs. Starting a business is not the only way Americans show initiative, self-reliance, and self-improvement. Reagan was good at acknowledging this.

2. I would welcome more events like the press conference in front of the closed Solyndra building. We got fired up about that one, and then...&lt;i&gt;nada&lt;/i&gt;. For starters, Romney should do one next to some unattractive public site that Obama refuses to drill on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. I agree that YDBT should not be forgotten, but it also should be expanded to include the majority of voters who are not entrepreneurs. Starting a business is not the only way Americans show initiative, self-reliance, and self-improvement. Reagan was good at acknowledging this.</p>
<p>2. I would welcome more events like the press conference in front of the closed Solyndra building. We got fired up about that one, and then&#8230;<i>nada</i>. For starters, Romney should do one next to some unattractive public site that Obama refuses to drill on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
