Image 01 Image 03

Iowa Caucus Day – Open and Updates

Iowa Caucus Day – Open and Updates

This post will be “sticky” until early evening when we go “Live” at about 7 p.m. 7:30 p.m. Eastern, and will collect news from Iowa during the day, with the most recent on top:


With the Iowa Caucuses just a few hours away and the live event scheduled to begin soon, some parting thoughts…

1.While the caucuses are important, and a win there signifies the strength of your campaign, it is far from determinative and is just the beginning of a long, arduous primary season. More than anything, Iowa results bring with it momentum for those who prevail, and perhaps a dose of reality for those who fail offering an opportunity for them to drop out.

2. There is this tendency for people to say the top 3 finishers  (the win, place, or show candidates) are the only ones who stand a chance at winning the nomination. Although a top 3 finish certainly adds momentum to a candidate’s campaign, John McCain took 4th in 2008 and at the end of the primaries was the one who stood toe to toe with Barack Obama in the general election.

3. In 2008 the Iowa winner, Mike Huckabee, took home over 34% of the vote. I think this year’s field will be much more spread out which opens the door for even the right 5th place finisher to possibly be able to grab the nomination if they do well in the later primaries. I stress that it has to be the right candidate because if a Bachmann or a Paul finish 5th in Iowa, their campaign is effectively over.

4. I hope you’ve enjoyed today’s updates and please check out and comment on the live feed once it is up and running around 7:30. The best part about the American political process is the dialogue and diversity of opinions so keep them coming!


Candidates “rock the caucus” at local Iowa high school. Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, and Michelle Bachmann, along with four of Mitt Romney’s children spoke to 800 students at Valley High School in Iowa attempting to garner support from potential young caucus goers. As is to be expected, Ron Paul got the most raucous applause following his speech to the group where he highlighted his typical talking points of slashing $1 trillion in federal spending, and bringing the troops home from Afghanistan.

Santorum used the time to take a few subtle jabs at the Obama administration warning the young students of the ramifications of the mounting debt accumulating under President Obama. While Santorum and Paul are the latest beneficiaries of the Not-Mitt conservative crowd in recent polls, it will be interesting to see how much of that poll support will actually translate into votes in the booth. While the traditional line of thinking is that because Paul supporters are the most “die hard”, his poll support is likely to show at the end of the night, I have a hard time buying into the fact that Paul’s stalwart libertarian base has suddenly expanded practically overnight from the mid-single digits into the low 20’s. For that reason, I think the recent support for Paul, like Santorum and the others, is the same fickle support that carries with it the “subject to change” asterisk that has plagued the entire Not-Mitt republican field.

As we inch closer to voting time, its still anybody’s game.


Mitt Romney is now making the final rounds in Iowa attempting to buoy his support above that seemingly impenetrable 25% ceiling that has dogged him throughout the entire election season. Although the frontrunner in many polls, Romney has positioned himself as an underdog in Iowa because of his inability to achieve any upward mobility there. Predictions have recently been released saying that Romney may win, but it will likely be with under 25% of the vote. To do so, he will rely heavily on the other candidates splitting up the remaining 75% amongst each other enough so that none of them crack the 25% mark either.

In a recent New York Times article, they argued that Romney could claim a relative victory even he is not in the top 3 at the end of the day today because of the cautious way in which he approached the Iowa Caucuses. However, while Romney had Iowa on the periphery of his campaign early on, he turned up the heat in December utilizing a combination of his campaign dollars and pro-Romney Super PACs to air nearly 3,800 ads in Iowa, more than any other candidate. Despite the nonchalance about Iowa the Romney campaign is attempting to project to the American public at large, the truth is that Romney has fixated his campaign directly on the caucuses and spent millions of campaign dollars there. Even a win with under 25% of the vote would still point out a gaping hole in Romney’s campaign strategy that will only become more apparent as the primaries move beyond New Hampshire: Money can’t buy you love with the conservative voting bloc.


Making the last-minute push for Gingrich: Newt’s daughter, Jackie Gingrich Cushman said today on Fox News, “We’re not nervous” about the upcoming caucuses. “Dad is the only candidate in the field, including President Barack Obama, who has on a national level, balanced a budget, reformed welfare, cut taxes, and cut spending. He’s done it before, and he can do it again.” She acknowledged that the millions of dollars spent on attack ads targeting her father have taken their toll on Gingrich’s once stellar numbers in Iowa, but recalls that nearly every single expert counted him out once before just a few months ago, only to be proven wrong. “He’s like the energizer bunny, he just goes on and on.”

Former one-time front runner Herman Cain, who suspended his campaign in early December, said on Fox News today that he has not suspended his mission for a national movement. But don’t expect an endorsement by caucus time or any of the early primaries. Cain said that he does not want to split his supporters by endorsing a candidate too early on, but that he will eventually back one of the candidates. Despite the fact that the Cain fervor is not as palpable as it once was, I think a Cain endorsement will still carry with it a noticeable amount of votes, but perhaps more importantly, a much needed influx of money left over from his campaign.


Iowans officially begin the caucus process today at 7pm Central. The polls are fluctuating on a seemingly daily basis with Rick Santorum and Ron Paul making their late surges while Mitt Romney continues to hold steady at around 23%. Although Gingrich has dropped back in the pack a bit of late due in large part to an onslaught of negative campaigning against him by his opponents in Iowa, he still has plenty of reason to believe he can fare well tonight.

Especially in the case of Iowa, these polls are not necessarily illustrative of what the outcome will be in the caucuses themselves. The most telling statistic of why Iowans are in a constant state of flip-flop is the fact that at least 40% remain undecided as to who they will cast their vote for when they actually step into the booth. Perhaps the only thing certain about tonight is that the outcome is anything but a foregone conclusion.

In other news, Bachmann has released a new ad signaling her floundering campaign intends to stay in the race in Iowa and beyond. This will not likely have a grand effect on the final results of the caucuses, but it could work to pull some of that conservative base away from Santorum and hamper his late surge.

Update:  Also check out the updates at And So It Goes In Shreveport.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


shanewright22 | January 3, 2012 at 12:04 pm

I feel like Bachmann is staying in the race until she either gets a lucrative book deal, someone offers to pay her campaign debts to exit, or she is jockeying for a cabinet position.

DINORightMarie | January 3, 2012 at 1:03 pm

Any feelings about the “Operation Chaos” rumor being bandied about by the MSM, which Rush mentioned on his show?

I’m thinking that these are die-hard ideologues who will go out in sub-zero weather to make it work, to sway the voting for Ron Paul.

And this begs the question(s): if Paul comes out on top, will it be because Iowans favor him, or liberals put him there? And, how will we know either way?

Just wonderin’.

“Despite the fact that the Cain ferver is not a palpable as it once was”

Wow! That’s the understatement of the day. Herman Cain is now doing interviews trying to remain relevant.

“I think a Cain endorsement will still carry with it a noticable amount of votes, but perhaps more importantly, a much needed influx of money left over from his campaign.”

Well, according to opensecrets, there isn’t that much money unless Cain robbed Brinks the last quarter of 2011. Opensecrets reported that at the end of Q3, Cain had raised $5,340,967, had spend $4,007,188 and had $1,333,779 on hand which included $675,000 in debt that represented the $675,000 that Cain loaned his own campaign. The left over $659,000 is chump change in any presidental campaign. It was also reported that Cain had bought massive numbers of his own self-published book the last month of his campaign to hand out to people at his rallies. What a win-win situation for Cain; spend donation money to up his book sales.

And yes, I remember that the Cain campaign put out that he was raking in the dough in the last quarter, but he was also spending it. Romney is doing the same thing; spending as fast as it comes in. $4.5 mil on just Iowa ads and that doesn’t include his PAC ads.

As to supplying those much needed votes; if there are so many of them, Professor, why did Cain drop out? If he had the numbers, no matter the body slams he was experiencing, he would have stayed in, but the truth is his popularity peaked too early, and he was doing what all things do that go up, they were coming down.

Look, Cain is a nice guy and likable. But he was never a serious candidate. Serious candidates, like Newt, eventually fight back. Cain folded. He, and his idiot campaign manager, could have ended the scandal by simply saying that Cain was requesting a release of all documents pertaining to the claims of the women. He didn’t do that. He made claims (internal reviews) that he did not back up.

I would just like to see Gingrich (the best spokesman) and Perry (the most improved) last through South Carolina.

As long as neither of them quit, just yet, and Paul doesn’t win, I will be content.

    terimwal in reply to Mutnodjmet. | January 3, 2012 at 2:21 pm

    Agree, Mut. Just watched a Dick Morris video where he said Romeny MUST win Iowa to save us from Ron Paul. I don’t understand why a Romeny win (or loss) necessarily means all that much in Iowa. We still have a long way to go.,

      retire05 in reply to terimwal. | January 3, 2012 at 4:23 pm

      Dick Morris is an idiot. His day has come, and gone, and now he just rides the wind, and that wind in 2010, and probably in 2012, is conservative.

      As to Romney taking Iowa, so what if he does? This ain’t over by a long shot, and FINALLY, someone mentioned the delegate count today. Carl Cameron pointed out that even if ONE candidate took ALL the early states and was awarded EVERY delegate, they would not have enough delegates to take the nomination. Something I have been trying to get across to people for weeks now.

      Also, Iowa is a proportional state. If Romney takes 30% (which is doubtful) he will only get 30% of 28 delegates. Eight delegates is a long way from the required 1,143.

      So………………here’s hoping that Newt does well, and Perry places in the top three (which he may).

Just checking in to see if the primaries are over yet, with Romney crushing the field in all 57 States.

Apparently I’m a few minutes early-

This thing has GOT to be over by 4:00, doesn’t it?

[…] You have another chance tonight. You should, by this time, be a bit more savvy. Granted, the candidates amongst whom you have to choose do not make up the greatest slate that’s ever been; there’s no Ronald Reagan (or even a Calvin Coolidge) for whom you might cast a vote tonight. […]

As for the Romeny-needs-to-exceed-25% meme, I might agree with this take if the field had already been winnowed down to 3-4 candidates. If some of the other candidates drop out and their supporters all rally around whoever’s left among them, so that the “conservative” bloc is now giving a non-Romney 50%+ of the vote, then obviously Romney will be toast if he’s still at 25%. So, yeah, this is majority rules and you do AT SOME POINT have to “break out” beyond 25%. The idea that Romney has to do so in Iowa — the first real contest — or there’s some huge flaw in his strategy seems like wishful thinking to me.

[…] – Legal Insurrection is running an open thread with updates. […]