<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Clintons: on being above the law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 02:40:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Motes</title>
		<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-584303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J Motes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=125003#comment-584303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An excellent comment, Midwest (may I call you Midwest?). I just have one eensy-teensy quibble about the phrase &quot;after they spend a few years in a comfortable prison&quot;. Does it have to be a comfortable prison? I kinda like to picture Him busting up great big rocks with a sledgehammer, day after day after day, and Her sweating over steamy washtubs in a prison laundry that is hotter than H-E-DoubleToothpicks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent comment, Midwest (may I call you Midwest?). I just have one eensy-teensy quibble about the phrase &#8220;after they spend a few years in a comfortable prison&#8221;. Does it have to be a comfortable prison? I kinda like to picture Him busting up great big rocks with a sledgehammer, day after day after day, and Her sweating over steamy washtubs in a prison laundry that is hotter than H-E-DoubleToothpicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randian</title>
		<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-584103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=125003#comment-584103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women and those who deem feminine sensibilities to be paramount (feminists) are those most fascinated by royals and royalty. They also, not coincidentally, form the largest base of liberal voters and the population from which journalists self select.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women and those who deem feminine sensibilities to be paramount (feminists) are those most fascinated by royals and royalty. They also, not coincidentally, form the largest base of liberal voters and the population from which journalists self select.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveGinOly</title>
		<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-584072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveGinOly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 22:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=125003#comment-584072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good one, Rags. That aspect had escaped me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one, Rags. That aspect had escaped me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valerie</title>
		<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-584042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valerie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=125003#comment-584042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I can identify the core problem.  It&#039;s right here:

&quot;Clinton electrified 400 of her peers at the women’s liberal arts college with a fiery speech that captured the young generation’s disillusionment over President Richard Nixon’s war in Vietnam.&quot;

Was it really &quot;Richard Nixon&#039;s war&quot;?  What does that phrase say about the writer of the article, aside from merely being tolerant of inaccuracy?

The US got involved in Vietnam on Kennedy&#039;s watch, and became more deeply involved throughout the Johnson presidency.  Nixon inherited that war from the Democrats.

The reason the Clintons act like they are above the law is because they know that Democrats will tell any kind of lie in support of a Democrat.

It isn&#039;t just the Clintons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I can identify the core problem.  It&#8217;s right here:</p>
<p>&#8220;Clinton electrified 400 of her peers at the women’s liberal arts college with a fiery speech that captured the young generation’s disillusionment over President Richard Nixon’s war in Vietnam.&#8221;</p>
<p>Was it really &#8220;Richard Nixon&#8217;s war&#8221;?  What does that phrase say about the writer of the article, aside from merely being tolerant of inaccuracy?</p>
<p>The US got involved in Vietnam on Kennedy&#8217;s watch, and became more deeply involved throughout the Johnson presidency.  Nixon inherited that war from the Democrats.</p>
<p>The reason the Clintons act like they are above the law is because they know that Democrats will tell any kind of lie in support of a Democrat.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t just the Clintons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheFineReport.com</title>
		<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-583997</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheFineReport.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=125003#comment-583997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They&#039;re not above the law. They&#039;re simply in league with other criminals, who in this case control whether they get officially investigated and prosecuted. 

And John Boehner is the GOP&#039;s Squeaker of the House. Elections of squeakers have consequences.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re not above the law. They&#8217;re simply in league with other criminals, who in this case control whether they get officially investigated and prosecuted. </p>
<p>And John Boehner is the GOP&#8217;s Squeaker of the House. Elections of squeakers have consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheFineReport.com</title>
		<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-583993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheFineReport.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=125003#comment-583993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are no adults under the age of 40. Soon, it&#039;ll be 50.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no adults under the age of 40. Soon, it&#8217;ll be 50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragspierre</title>
		<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-583990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ragspierre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=125003#comment-583990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Clinton electrified 400 of her peers at the women’s liberal arts college with a fiery speech that captured the young generation’s disillusionment over President Richard Nixon’s war in Vietnam.&quot;

Wow.

Talk about shooting fish in a barrel...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Clinton electrified 400 of her peers at the women’s liberal arts college with a fiery speech that captured the young generation’s disillusionment over President Richard Nixon’s war in Vietnam.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow.</p>
<p>Talk about shooting fish in a barrel&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiny Norman</title>
		<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-583989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spiny Norman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=125003#comment-583989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d wager that if you asked &quot;adults&quot; under the age of 40, a significant majority would tell you Nixon was responsible for the entire Vietnam War.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d wager that if you asked &#8220;adults&#8221; under the age of 40, a significant majority would tell you Nixon was responsible for the entire Vietnam War.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clafoutis</title>
		<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-583982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clafoutis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=125003#comment-583982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the incredible performances of both McConnell and Boehner since November, it would appear that some Master Plan is working like a charm.

And Loretta Lynch will assure nothing goes wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the incredible performances of both McConnell and Boehner since November, it would appear that some Master Plan is working like a charm.</p>
<p>And Loretta Lynch will assure nothing goes wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom swift</title>
		<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-583981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom swift]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=125003#comment-583981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;a fiery speech that captured the young generation’s disillusionment over President Richard Nixon’s war in Vietnam.&lt;/i&gt;

Huh? Kennedy&#039;s and Johnson&#039;s wars in VN were OK, but not Nixon&#039;s? Dumb college kids think Vietnam was &quot;Nixon&#039;s war&quot;, but adults should know better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>a fiery speech that captured the young generation’s disillusionment over President Richard Nixon’s war in Vietnam.</i></p>
<p>Huh? Kennedy&#8217;s and Johnson&#8217;s wars in VN were OK, but not Nixon&#8217;s? Dumb college kids think Vietnam was &#8220;Nixon&#8217;s war&#8221;, but adults should know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midwest Rhino</title>
		<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-583980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Midwest Rhino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=125003#comment-583980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Certainly Billary must feel they will get away with these brazen acts ... though these recent revelations make me wonder if they aren&#039;t somewhere deep inside trying to get caught, by being so audacious.

The Clinton book I&#039;d like to read is written after they spend a few years in a comfortable prison, written by their psychiatrist.  What pathologies were at work, that would make the largest figures in the Democrat party into such lecherous, contemptuous, and traitorous villains?  Or vice versa, what collectivist pathology makes such greedy, dishonest, arrogant figures into the heads of the Democrat party?  A match made in some globalist hell I suppose.

&quot;Above&quot; the law is right in one sense, but in another they try to thread the needle through the holes in the fabric of the justice system.  They seem to feel if they do the right paperwork, and delete or kill the evidence, then they threaded their way &quot;through&quot; the law.  If they are not found guilty in court, then they are simply NOT guilty.  That&#039;s how the legal game is played ... he who has the most lawyers wins, especially if he finds sympathetic leftist judges that owe favors.

Obviously the Clintons work at coverup, so they don&#039;t think they are above the law, only that they own enough people in their &quot;racketeering cabal&quot; (as I see it), that any prosecution can be short circuited, obstructed, delayed, dismissed.  They don&#039;t care if they are presumed guilty outside of court, as long as they can make the LIV hate the Republican more, using the Alinksy playbook on subversion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly Billary must feel they will get away with these brazen acts &#8230; though these recent revelations make me wonder if they aren&#8217;t somewhere deep inside trying to get caught, by being so audacious.</p>
<p>The Clinton book I&#8217;d like to read is written after they spend a few years in a comfortable prison, written by their psychiatrist.  What pathologies were at work, that would make the largest figures in the Democrat party into such lecherous, contemptuous, and traitorous villains?  Or vice versa, what collectivist pathology makes such greedy, dishonest, arrogant figures into the heads of the Democrat party?  A match made in some globalist hell I suppose.</p>
<p>&#8220;Above&#8221; the law is right in one sense, but in another they try to thread the needle through the holes in the fabric of the justice system.  They seem to feel if they do the right paperwork, and delete or kill the evidence, then they threaded their way &#8220;through&#8221; the law.  If they are not found guilty in court, then they are simply NOT guilty.  That&#8217;s how the legal game is played &#8230; he who has the most lawyers wins, especially if he finds sympathetic leftist judges that owe favors.</p>
<p>Obviously the Clintons work at coverup, so they don&#8217;t think they are above the law, only that they own enough people in their &#8220;racketeering cabal&#8221; (as I see it), that any prosecution can be short circuited, obstructed, delayed, dismissed.  They don&#8217;t care if they are presumed guilty outside of court, as long as they can make the LIV hate the Republican more, using the Alinksy playbook on subversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakee308</title>
		<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-583976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jakee308]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=125003#comment-583976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I blame the Media. They&#039;ve attempted (and partially succeeded) to create a &quot;Royal&quot; Family in the United States.

They succeeded with Kennedy but he was murdered and the whole thing collapsed. Which is one reason why the Media hated Nixon, hates the right and will say anything to elevate their &quot;Chosen One&quot; to the almost godhead. Because they&#039;re jealous of the Brits or something.

No one can deny that the complicity of the Media then and their &quot;previous to recently&quot; false and baseless praise and at excuses haven&#039;t contributed to their sense of a &quot;Cocoon&quot; protecting them from the effects and responses to their actions.

Only until Obama and his crew decided they would renege on their deal to at least keep silent about Hillary has the bubble been penetrated and there&#039;s still the chance they may skate on the most damning of evidence. Her chances of being elected President are quickly diminishing. I think they knew this could happen which is why she played so coy for so long and tried to rush the gate and fumbled.

There were rumors of what Obama (read Valerie Jarrett) would do or might do  or could do so they played a waiting game to see if anything happened. When it didn&#039;t they started to think they&#039;d got away with it all and that ValJar was going to let them slide or maybe they got head faked into making the jump. Either way all this coming out has at the least got the tacit approval by Obama to happen if not been orchestrated and perhaps planned since 2008.

Now we have to see what part 2 of this saga will be and whether anyone on the right has the brains,  courage and the will to know what to do to overcome the Democrats and the Media&#039;s continued attempt at some kind of American Dynasty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I blame the Media. They&#8217;ve attempted (and partially succeeded) to create a &#8220;Royal&#8221; Family in the United States.</p>
<p>They succeeded with Kennedy but he was murdered and the whole thing collapsed. Which is one reason why the Media hated Nixon, hates the right and will say anything to elevate their &#8220;Chosen One&#8221; to the almost godhead. Because they&#8217;re jealous of the Brits or something.</p>
<p>No one can deny that the complicity of the Media then and their &#8220;previous to recently&#8221; false and baseless praise and at excuses haven&#8217;t contributed to their sense of a &#8220;Cocoon&#8221; protecting them from the effects and responses to their actions.</p>
<p>Only until Obama and his crew decided they would renege on their deal to at least keep silent about Hillary has the bubble been penetrated and there&#8217;s still the chance they may skate on the most damning of evidence. Her chances of being elected President are quickly diminishing. I think they knew this could happen which is why she played so coy for so long and tried to rush the gate and fumbled.</p>
<p>There were rumors of what Obama (read Valerie Jarrett) would do or might do  or could do so they played a waiting game to see if anything happened. When it didn&#8217;t they started to think they&#8217;d got away with it all and that ValJar was going to let them slide or maybe they got head faked into making the jump. Either way all this coming out has at the least got the tacit approval by Obama to happen if not been orchestrated and perhaps planned since 2008.</p>
<p>Now we have to see what part 2 of this saga will be and whether anyone on the right has the brains,  courage and the will to know what to do to overcome the Democrats and the Media&#8217;s continued attempt at some kind of American Dynasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragspierre</title>
		<link>http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04/the-clintons-on-being-above-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-583973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ragspierre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalinsurrection.com/?p=125003#comment-583973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I submit, therefore, that it is somewhat rational for the Clintons to believe they are above the law. Events so far have proven them correct, haven’t they?&quot;

Sure.  It was TOTALLY rational for Al Capone to believe he was above the law.  He owned the law in Chicago, and made no bones when bragging about it.

Now, as you&#039;d expect from &quot;Slick Willie&quot; and Ol&#039; Walleyes, they are much less open and vulgar about the people they own and the influence they wield than was Capone.

But everyone knows who these people are, just like we all really know who Barracula is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I submit, therefore, that it is somewhat rational for the Clintons to believe they are above the law. Events so far have proven them correct, haven’t they?&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure.  It was TOTALLY rational for Al Capone to believe he was above the law.  He owned the law in Chicago, and made no bones when bragging about it.</p>
<p>Now, as you&#8217;d expect from &#8220;Slick Willie&#8221; and Ol&#8217; Walleyes, they are much less open and vulgar about the people they own and the influence they wield than was Capone.</p>
<p>But everyone knows who these people are, just like we all really know who Barracula is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
