————————————

I don’t know you.
Maybe you are the nicest person in the whole world, but your little tantrum fits the above definition.
IMO

If you go around pretending to possess superior knowledge when in fact you don’t, somebody will point it to you. The humble thing to do is to verify/admit that you indeed made a mistake. Then we all move on.
Insulting those who correct your mistakes: a sign of arrogance.

And yes, I can be a tad pedant sometimes.
You know, when the mistakes are too obvious…can’t help myself.

Actually, they do. If your son would prefer to kiss a boy than a girl he is more likely to get involved in drug abuse, more likely to commit suicide, more likely to contract an STD, hepatitis or AIDS, and more likely to develop structural problems with his rectum.

Of course, your leftist moron of a doctor doesn’t see any problem with any of that.

Cash-friendly doctors, who don’t bow to Government/Insurance companies:

http://www.aapsonline.org/index.php/site/article/direct_payment_cash_friendly_practices/

AAPS is the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, an outfit that sued over Hillary Care and ObamaCAre!

http://www.AAPSonline.Org

The one disagreement I have is this: I have known of three or four situations where parents were either unaware of problems, or the parent was “powerless” to help despite knowledge, or actually the parent abused the child. The problems were not so much along the sexual identify confusion line, so much as sheer, raw abuse that was not discovered or abused.

That said, if the abuse is sexual and severe, most young children simply will not tell, even if asked. They simply don’t understand the world enough to know of their own innocence, and that the criminal will be punished, and not them. I know this because of discussions I’ve had with those who were abused.

Also, in one case, the abuser threatened to kill the child and his family.

So, I completely agree these questions are completely inappropriate, the fact is, I know some children will be left alone and hurting because there can be no utopia.

Language devolves to the lowest constant denominator, rather than the former trend of evolving with more words for more specific meanings. English is being dumbed down.

http://www.AAPSonline.Org

If you’re not a physician, you can join for free! I’ve joined and I’ve attended one of their conferences.

Both “reveal” and “read” can be used as nouns too. You could have looked that up in a dictionary before posting.

The same happens with gift. I found it’s definition as a verb in at least three different dictionaries.
Don’t believe me. Look it up.

The big reveal in a story is the event that shocks you or surprises you or has you going “hmmmm, yeah, I see where that came from”

Now back to your hole.

Doctors who don’t like patients may refer them to another doctor. Patients and or guardians who don’t like their doctor may seek out another.

Do NOT let anyone frame this as a categorical question. It is an individual question within the relationship between doctor and patient. Nobody outside that relationship gets a vote in what will or will not occur within. Patient/guardian controls that.

“…you are lying if you say that society’s “’cultural norms’” have never changed.”

Which is why I would never make a statement like that. You stupid, FLUCKING, moron.

“See, inter alia, women’s right to vote and own property, dowry laws…”

Was that an essential cultural norm? Oh, and WHO supported the franchise for wimmins? Learn some history, ya moron. (Hint: which states were the pioneers?)

“…restrictions on marriage of first cousins…”

Look up the plague of birth defects in England among Pakistani immigrants, you stupid, people-hating bastard.

“…abolition of slavery, abolition of Jim Crow (although I admit this one is ongoing)…”

Chalk that up for MY ideological peeeples. Capitalists were FOR treating everyone equally. YOUR BIG GOVERNMENT types were the authors of Jim Crow, you lying SOS.

“…criminalization and subsequent decriminalization of marijuana (in some jurisdictions), contraction and subsequent expansion of the right to bear arms…”

Both historically PROGRESSIVE issues that have been going back and forth. NOT “cultural norms”, you moron. Just trends in what society considered worth legislation.

“…interracial marriage…”

Again, YOUR BIG GOVERNMENT at work.

“pre-marital co-habitation, smoking cigarettes, wearing hats outdoors, wearing full suits of clothes, women wearing short skirts, tolerance of left-handed writing, etc etc.”

You’re too stupid…or dishonest…to distinguish between an “essential cultural norm” and fads, vogues, and trends.

But I’ve never found you intelligent, informed, or honest.

It’s been fun, punk.

Throughout human existence, children have naturally developed a sense of their sexuality in their own good time, and for almost all of them the matter of what gender they are is simply not an issue. If it is an issue, that will have become quite obvious to the parents.

Now, the government-controlled schools and the government-controlled physicians are forcefully turning a child’s natural development into a complicated and confusing issue at an early age. Clearly the boy in this story found it confusing that things so obvious (“I’m a boy! I’d rather kiss girls!”) were being thrown into doubt.

Because a tiny part of the population falls out of the norm in these areas, leftists want to make them confusing for everyone — for children as young as five years old.

They also want the government — not the parents who really care about their children — to decide how the issues will be handled, and to do so while the parents are out of the room and out of the loop. The government will hold you responsible for supporting your children and will hold you accountable if your children misbehave, but the government will not allow you to make fundamental decisions about your child’s education and moral or emotional development.

Welcome to totalitarian statism. Enjoy the ride.

See, inter alia, women’s right to vote and own property, dowry laws, restrictions on marriage of first cousins, abolition of slavery, abolition of Jim Crow (although I admit this one is ongoing), criminalization and subsequent decriminalization of marijuana (in some jurisdictions), contraction and subsequent expansion of the right to bear arms, interracial marriage, pre-marital co-habitation, smoking cigarettes, wearing hats outdoors, wearing full suits of clothes, women wearing short skirts, tolerance of left-handed writing, etc etc.

Now you’re pretending that a decision by the Supremes changes reality.

So we’ve demonstrated you are just a Collectivist bung-sucker.

Again.

Thanks for your help!

See you in June for the Obergefell decision party!

But you can live polygamy. You just can’t hold yourself out as “married” in Western culture.