The police can’t protect you…only respond with force. Arm and protect yourselves.

Instead, all the moderate Muslims must be protected until they’re mature and become fully fledged jihadits, slaughtering their thousands in the name of spiritual purity. I’m looking forward to hearing the liberal feminists scream with outrage when their Mosque leaders demand all woman submit to female circumcision. Multiculturalism indeed!

The reality, as you have pointed out, is the people who do this sort of thing just go get their guns illegally and do it anyways.

One wonders why he wasn’t denied bail for his murder trial.

Like Major Hassan or the monsters of Rothingham, this guy was a KNOWN danger to society. He should have been OFF the streets.

He was a KNOWN Wolf. Not merely a “Lone Wolf”.

Oh, good. It’s great to hear the recitation of the rules.

The gun used in this crime was a sawn off shot gun… it was not a legal weapon but an illegal weapon.

But… but, the rules! What about the rules?

Also FYI most Australians do not feel the need to own a gun and thus we remain gun free.

“We” remain available as hostages and defenseless dupes. “We” are only gun free until confronted with the muzzle of the weapon of someone who isn’t “one of us”.

But it doesn’t sound like “we” are much concerned with seeing to it that those “others” are held to the rules, does it. Who pungled up all the legal fees for Man Haron Monis in all his court travails, and what the hell was he doing out of jail, and was he coddled as an “other” because the PC choir felt the laws should be lenient?

It was only afterwards, as an afterthought, that I discovered that two of the hostages had perished.

So the backlash story was out before the bodies were cold. I somehow find that… reprehensible. Deeply so.

The police acted appropriately.

He was known to police because of his past. Once he was identified by the police they knew immediately who he was.

The guy was a monster and I cannot understand why he was allowed out of jail on bail. I do suspect that he had a mental illness but I cannot prove the same. Please do not misunderstand me on this point because I do think that what I read about his behaviour inside the cafe was very erratic and extreme. At the same time I believe that anyone who stays within Islam is mentally defective.

Australians continue to own guns and they do so when they are licenced to own a gun. There are more guns owned today than prior to the Port Arthur massacre. Guns are used in a lot of crime and murders in Australia especially among bikie gangs and drug dealers. There has been a spate of incidents involving guns in recent weeks… except that those guns are illegal weapons (obtained illegally or they have been altered to make them illegal).

Until now we have not felt the need to possess a gun.

The gun used in this crime was a sawn off shot gun… it was not a legal weapon but an illegal weapon.

Australia has an issue with gun crime mostly among gangs made up of Middle Eastern types, but also some Asians (not Pakistani) being involved. Prior to this incident there was a spate of shootings involving people from the Muslim community including an incident involving the mother of the notorious Hamzy (in prison for his terrorist activity) who was the founder of Brothers4Life.

Most of the weapons involved in these incidents have been illegally obtained.

FYI at the time of the Port Arthur massacre a number of gun owners surrendered their weapons, but recently I noticed an article that indicated that the ownership of similar weapons that are legally approved has been on the rise and more weapons are owned than at that time. So does that sound like we are gun free?

Also FYI most Australians do not feel the need to own a gun and thus we remain gun free.

I think that it is most likely that he was behaving in a criminal fashion in Iran and that he did end up in jail prior to him fleeing the country…

Perhaps his lawyer is correct in stating that the man was “damaged goods”.