And unsupported musings, speculation, and value judgments aren’t “facts”. The video is a fact-free opinion piece. Learn the difference and maybe you’ll persuade more people.

WOW, again project much? So, “not all of it”. Does that mean you watched the first 3 seconds, made up your mind and moved on? It was not that long. You have [likely] spent far more time typing in comments dissing the video than it would have taken you to see the entire thing. If you had bothered to see the entire video you would have learned that it was full of facts. It just contradicts your “faith” about feminism and so you believe it can be safely ignored. Sounds like you are a full fledged member of the “community based reality” crowd. Good luck with that and have a nice day.

Did you forget what you posted?

“And I’m betting you have evidence to support that speculation. Right?”

Yup, check out the right wing site that tells you what to look for and then check out the financial statement by corporate to verify the numbers. Not that you will bother to read it because it is too much work to yah know actually understand and form an opinion.

“Yeah, they really rake it in providing low or no-cost services to women who can’t otherwise afford it.”

Wow, you are really are an idiot. I guess that because you are a liberal money doesn’t apply to you. Check out the financials corporate puts out. A huge percentage of their income comes from fees from the clinics. And where do those fees come from?

“(a) Sure you do. (b) Argument by anecdote is neither “interesting” nor persuasive.”

But no argument is even better.

“That would be the fact, and evidence-free “hint”, yes?”

Since it is difficult for you to form an opinion based on anything other than a liberal echo chamber. I have conveniently provided you some evidence just like mommy and daddy do when they let you stay in their house.

And my response wasn’t “don’t have to”. It was more or less, “some of it”. See it before – the same fact-free ramblings in a new package, this time with a pleasant woman doing the selling rather than someone of actual power and influence among the GOP.

And unsupported musings, speculation, and value judgments aren’t “facts”. The video is a fact-free opinion piece. Learn the difference and maybe you’ll persuade more people.

No. It was a goal several of you described as something that NOW DOESN”T ADDRESS/

“Or maybe PP makes a large percentage of their profit from running women through the infuriating process of getting a prescription for something that would have been long ago classified as OTC in any other context.”

And I’m betting you have evidence to support that speculation. Right?

“Could it be that PP is all about money?”

Yeah, they really rake it in providing low or no-cost services to women who can’t otherwise afford it.

“Interestingly I know women that face this stupidity every time they need a new birth control prescription.”

(a) Sure you do. (b) Argument by anecdote is neither “interesting” nor persuasive.

“Take the hint NOW isn’t about women’s rights any more than liberals are for the downtrodden.”

That would be the fact, and evidence-free “hint”, yes?

What does that have to do with whether the author is a woman – you know, your first lame gotcha attempt?

Project much? This is my first post on this article. I did not say anything about the author being a woman. I did asked if you even watched the video you are slamming and your response is “don’t have to”. How tolerant of you. For your information (since you said you did not watch the video) the video is full of facts. Facts that you might learn from if you are open to learning. Facts that show how modern feminists are twisting the truth to drive an addenda. I guess you don’t care if you are being used and long as it is by other women?

Or maybe PP makes a large percentage of their profit from running women through the infuriating process of getting a prescription for something that would have been long ago classified as OTC in any other context. Could it be that PP is all about money?

Interestingly I know women that face this stupidity every time they need a new birth control prescription. Take the hint NOW isn’t about women’s rights any more than liberals are for the downtrodden.

Why is it that men need to stand up for women? Can’t they do it on their own? I know that my wife doesn’t need my help but I guess that you will never know a woman that intimately.

But I suspect that since NOW’s position on OTC birth control is that it’s bad alternative to what women have now because (a) it’s more expensive; and (b) hardly any of it is approved by the FDA for over the counter sale. Plus, as we all know, the “rights” sudden and spontaneous interest in OTC birth control is just a transparent attempt to try to woo women voters. But it doesn’t matter; you don’t think you have a problem, and thus won’t change your policies. And you don’t understand that your rancid policies and candidates are the problem. You think that women are just too stupid to know what’s good for them – which is another part of your problem, one you have no understanding of.

What does that have to do with whether the author is a woman – you know, your first lame gotcha attempt?