Ah, but that is both a stupid statement and counter-factual.

More and more people take this site seriously. That is empirically true.

You took it so seriously, you were compelled to come here and troll.

What a shame to be you. How embarrassing.

A truly good book debut is somewhere in the 135-140k range physical books, and some additional e-reader books. Mrs. Clinton’s numbers were anemic at best. The tour is a disaster on wheels, getting worse with every promotional stop and every interview. Look for sales to drop off significantly.

If you want an example of a STRONG release, take a peek at first week numbers for Rush Revere and the brave pilgrims. 158,000 physical copies and 20,000 digital.

Er…I mean Warren!

Democrat Hack Hack Hack…….

That’s which one.

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/06/hillary-clinton-book-107959.html

Just one gaffe after another, coupled with anemic sales that are trending down, according to people in the business.

I mean, who knew that having $100,000,000 was not “being well-off”…?!?!

First week sales were “strong.”

“Sales figures provided by Nielsen Bookscan, which were first reported on by BuzzFeed, show that 85,721 physical books were sold during the week ending Sunday June 15. “Hard Choices” was released June 10.”

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/hillary-clinton-hard-choices-sells-85-000-hardcovers-week-report-article-1.1834721#ixzz35RD48pKD

Plus she sold at least another 25k digital copies.

When you rely on the Weekly Standard for your data, and get too lazy and sloppy to check things objectively, this is the kind of partisan nonsense propaganda you end up posting here.

No wonder so few people take you seriously anymore.

Six years of listening to Zero’s clean, non-Negro dialect (except when he wants it) have been more than the average person can bear. Please don’t afflict us further with 4+ years of Ugly Lizzie or her SAB twin Billary ~

The problem Hillary presents for the Democrats is that except for the niche of well-heeled far leftists who support Warren, she has most of the big donors either locked up or staying neutral until she formally decides.

The potential other candidates like Malloy, Cuomo, or Bayh can’t even really test the waters as long as Big Mama is hogging the pool.

No decent American would ever vote for her, so that tops her out at about 47% of the popular vote.

I’ve been saying MoooOOOooochelle is the one to watch out for for several months.

That’s surprising. Usually she has no problem telling outright lies. Must be some handler told her it’s better politics to play it cute.

http://nypost.com/2014/06/21/inside-the-jealous-feud-between-the-obamas-and-hildebeest-clintons/

Yah? Bullspit.

Lyin’ Lizzie, strikes again…

BUT, there is this out today…

“Bill got into it right away,” said a Clinton family friend. “He told Obama, ‘Hillary and I are gearing up for a run in 2016.’ He said Hillary would be ‘the most qualified, most experienced candidate, perhaps in history.’ His reference to Hillary’s experience made Obama wince, since it was clearly a shot at his lack of experience when he ran for president.

“And so Bill continued to talk about Hillary’s qualifications . . . and the coming campaign in 2016. But Barack didn’t bite. He changed the subject several times. Then suddenly, Barack said something that took Bill by complete surprise. He said, ‘You know, Michelle would make a great presidential candidate, too.’”

Remember, you heard it here first…