This is the latest in a series on the use of the race card for political gain:
I’m coming to regret using the term “racist” about the Tea Party. “Racist” is a personal insult, and it’s almost as impossible to prove it as to disprove it. It’s not a terribly illuminating term, either: If you call me a racist, you haven’t really described anything I’ve done that’s objectionable. You’ve just somehow designated me, and my so-far unchallenged arguments, outside the pale, so to speak.
If we are to call people our for the false accusation of racism, then we should credit them for recognizing the error of their ways.
Walsh’s observation (not necessarily anything else she says in the column) pretty much is the point of the Saturday Night Card Game series.
The accusation of racism is the liberal mechanism for ending the debate on an issue, to put an argument outside the pale without addressing the merits.
The race card is the most common symptom of the disease of left-wing epistemic closure.
I like Taranto’s description:
But we have argued for years against the pernicious practice of falsely imputing racism to one’s opponents in order to discredit them–a practice so common among liberals that entire academic subspecialties are devoted to it. It is tremendously encouraging to see someone of Walsh’s persuasion acknowledge the point.
More from Taranto in this audio podcast on Rand Paul and Joan Walsh.
Now I’m waiting for the other people highlighted in this series to admit the error of their ways, so we can have honest policy debates without the trash talk which is the race card.
Come on, Charles Blow, Norah O’Donnell, Chris Matthews, Max Blumenthal, Sheldon Whitehouse, Harry Reid, Joy Behar, Matt Taibbi, Jesse Jackson, John Cole, Digby, Southern Poverty Law Center, Jesse Taylor, DownWithTyranny, and Oliver Willis.
If Joan Walsh can do it, so can you. At least try. Pretty please.
Saturday Night Card Game